Wizard of Ozz":2dcnvmxa said:
I liked the 75s better especially for the heavy chugg rhythms... They hold together better. The 60s might be better for lead and lighter rhythm stuff.
I would agree. I think the 75 has the slight advantage for the Brootal stuff. The weight savings is amazing on the Neo. I can throw that 4X12 around like it's nothing. I believe they are 4.2lbs each.
Joeytpg":2dcnvmxa said:
sounds mean. Care to make some clean channel clips too?
Thanks bro.
I can do that. Would you like to hear pristine clean or dirty? No FX or some chorus? I have to admit though I'm not much of a clean player. I'll do my best though.
MetalHeadMike":2dcnvmxa said:
Wow...That's a Paul. Sounds like enough bass to knock down walls.
Mike, this amp is mean as hell. I wasn't sure what to expect until I plugged in and was blown away. Those vids are ch3. It's a lot like the D-Moll to me but more open, more upper mids. The amp cuts incredibly well. It may be marketed as more vintage but I wouldn't hesitate to use this amp for the most brutal downtuned stuff I could think of.
I've owned a Herbert and a D-Moll. Played a VH4 for a couple weeks. They are all fantastic in their own rights but this amp is more my style. I'm hoping to play a Hagen at NAMM to see if I need one of those.
FWIW I loaded Gold Lion KT77s in the power and all Ruby AC5HG and HG+
Thank you guys for checking out the clips.