2A

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsm
  • Start date Start date
The brake works, eh?
:p



I'd like to try a CheyTac. Even if capable of 2500+ yds., not sure I could hit the side of the mountain let alone a 18x30 steel target. :ROFLMAO:
Yeah it does.

My son has looked hard at CheyTac. He says his main issue is that the ones he is interested in are proprietary cheytac chamberings.
 
Though I understand that some people simply do not *wish* the 2nd Amendment to be a clear and simple statement of *right*, which it is,

it’s always a little disheartening when people who wish to quibble over the meaning of individual words in it,

just refuse to acknowledge the basic historical context, a superficial understanding of which provides all the elucidation required for a thorough understanding of this straightforwardly-written amendment

and the kicker is, that the amendment benefits everyone equally, and those who militate against it are essentially arguing for their own subjugation

smdh
Not only that but they are advocating for the people they claim to be racist, who hunt and kill young black men, cops, to be the only ones with guns.

You have to be a special kind of stupid to want the government to control all the guns. This is exactly why the 2A was included in the BOR in the first place.
 
Not only that but they are advocating for the people they claim to be racist, who hunt and kill young black men, cops, to be the only ones with guns.
You sure about that? They'd love to disarm Law Enforcement.
 
You have to be a special kind of stupid to want the government to control all the guns. This is exactly why the 2A was included in the BOR in the first place.


article-6053b57acda01.gif
 
Look up Illinois new "Assault" weapons ban. There are exemptions for cops, first responders, elected officials, etc..

At any rate they know they cannot disarm LEO so calling for gun bans is tantamount to calling for only the government and LEO to have guns. Well and criminals obviously.
I'm not saying the exemption isn't there. Of course it is. What I'm saying is that they would also love to disarm LE if they could.
 
Look up Illinois new "Assault" weapons ban. There are exemptions for cops, first responders, elected officials, etc..

At any rate they know they cannot disarm LEO so calling for gun bans is tantamount to calling for only the government and LEO to have guns. Well and criminals obviously.

The citizens of WA State just got screwed over like this (maybe worse) just two days ago. The dipshit Gov and his third-grade virtue signalling even got his attaboy from Brandon. Fucking pathetic.
 
He should stay in Australia where his opinion matters. 2A > opinions. 2A > feelings.

I'll be sure to forget about this in the coming winter when I enjoy long range shooting with my Barrett M99 Heavy Barrel 50 BMG.

https://barrett.net/products/firearms/model-99/

....and in the fall with my various other handguns, PCC and long guns of various calibers.

thanks for sharing. ?
I just thought it was funny but Australia hasn't had any mass shootings since the ban so maybe just maybe they're on to something. Just like how there were less mass shootings before W Bush lifted the "assault" weapons ban. Sense makes sense.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ccn
I just thought it was funny but Australia hasn't had any mass shootings since the ban so maybe just maybe they're on to something. Just like how there were less mass shootings before W Bush lifted the "assault" weapons ban. Sense makes sense.
nah, we have more crazyass people in the US, guns, trucks, etc., Americans will find a way to kill with whatever's available.
 
I just thought it was funny but Australia hasn't had any mass shootings since the ban so maybe just maybe they're on to something. Just like how there were less mass shootings before W Bush lifted the "assault" weapons ban. Sense makes sense.
That's because the only people who have them are trigger happy police there. They NEVER shoot to stop, they ALWAYS shoot to kill.

I'm all for gun bans...................but ONLY if these conditions are met and if they're not they are NOT serious, and it's to keep the population under a police state. aka: oppressed.

1) EVERYONE, including police and military, have no guns whatsoever. EVERYONE means EVERYONE.
2) All munitions factories are closed down
3) Thereafter if ANYONE is caught with a gun or makeshift gun...........quick capital punishment, with no appeal, is used.

If they can't agree this, citizens should NOT give up anything because they are being lied to and what's good for the goose is good for the gander
It's THAT simple.
 
That's because the only people who have them are trigger happy police there. They NEVER shoot to stop, they ALWAYS shoot to kill.

I'm all for gun bans...................but ONLY if these conditions are met and if they're not they are NOT serious, and it's to keep the population under a police state. aka: oppressed.

1) EVERYONE, including police and military, have no guns whatsoever. EVERYONE means EVERYONE.
2) All munitions factories are closed down
3) Thereafter if ANYONE is caught with a gun or makeshift gun...........quick capital punishment, with no appeal, is used.

If they can't agree this, citizens should NOT give up anything because they are being lied to and what's good for the goose is good for the gander
It's THAT simple.
if you're gonna draw / pull your firearm, you always shoot to kill. that's why it has to be an actual life or death situation, not just fear or preemptive. my carry firearms have the most lethal rounds available to civilians, not target rounds. If I have to draw and fire, I will not be trying to wound you or scare you; at that point it's your life vs mine / my loved ones, and I am not taking any chances or losing.

many times someone draws and fires without cause. I recall the armed robber in a small restaurant, he robbed patrons at gunpoint but never fired. As he was leaving, a patron drew his firearm and fired at the robber hitting him in the back. That was unjustified IMO. Now, had the robber fired his weapon or shot someone, that would be justified.

If you shoot someone in the back, that means they're fleeing and not an imminent threat to you or others; now if they shot someone else before fleeing, then you might have justifiable cause.

the last thing I want to do is take someone's life and I hope I'm never in that situation; but if I am, I am prepared to do what's necessary to protect my family and myself; the rest of the public can protect themselves "they're not my concern; unless they are children".

just sayin'
 
Last edited:
if you're gonna draw / pull your firearm, you always shoot to kill. that's why it has to be an actual life or death situation, not just fear or preemptive. my carry firearms have the most lethal rounds available to civilians, not target rounds. If I have to draw and fire, I will not be trying to wound you.

many times someone draws and fires without cause. I recall the armed robber in a small restaurant, he robbed patrons at gunpoint but never fired. As he was leaving, a patron drew his firearm and fired at the robber hitting him in the back. That was unjustified IMO. Now, had the robber fired his weapon or shot someone, that would be justified.

If you shoot someone in the back, that means they're fleeing and not an imminent threat to you; now if they shot someone else before fleeing, then you might have justifiable cause.

the last thing I want to do is take someone's life and I hope I'm never in that situation; but if I am, I am prepared to do what's necessary to protect my family and myself; the rest of the public can protect themselves "they're not my concern; unless they are children".

just sayin'
I hear you but I was talking about Australia where police shoot citizens dead who DON'T have a gun at all.

There have been instances there where they have shot dead people approx. 40 ft from them wielding only a knife. Women too.

If their citizens don't have guns why do their police walk the streets in FULL kill riot gear. Not all police but many do.
 
I hear you but I was talking about Australia where police shoot citizens dead who DON'T have a gun at all.

There have been instances there where they have shot dead people approx. 40 ft from them wielding only a knife. Women too.

If their citizens don't have guns why do their police walk the streets in FULL kill riot gear. Not all police but many do.
well, as we've seen, some parts of Australia were effectively under martial law without declaration, and law enforcement abused their power and authority during the pandemic. The basically behaved like gestapo. IIRC it was New South Wales, and after the pandemic they tried to apologize and dismiss their gestapo tactics; hopefully most NSW citizens didn't accept the excuses or apologies. once you're disarmed, you're fucked.

I'm not being a tough guy, but if we have firearms confiscations and the government or government bureaucracy decides to change laws that make me an instant felon, I will not comply. There are a few things I am willing to kill or die for, my family, myself and my Constitutional rights. I'm too old to give a fuck about anything else.

FWIW, there are an estimated 80 million gun owners in the USA, and an estimated 393 million guns owned legally by civilians. If even 10% think like I do and stand their ground against tyranny and infringement, it's gonna be carnage on an epic scale.

I'm not calling anyone out, just speaking for myself. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I won't give that up peacefully.

edit: fixed the numbers
 
Last edited:
FWIW, there are an estimated 393 million gun owners in the USA, and an estimated 450 million guns owned legally by civilians.
You mean 393 million citizens, not gun owners I assume. Closer to 330 mil US citizens.
 
Back
Top