Astrobotics moon mission not going great

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
Anyways, it appears the claim that there are less than 20 pics of astronauts on the moon during the apollo 11 mission still stands.
 
TL;DR however I'm sure knowing this forum people have said the reason the mission has been delayed is because Paramount or Universal Studios needs more time to create a backdrop for the landing in a movie studio.
 
TL;DR however I'm sure knowing this forum people have said the reason the mission has been delayed is because Paramount or Universal Studios needs more time to create a backdrop for the landing in a movie studio.
They can't go back because Kubrick is dead.

?
 
I do. I think it’s interesting and puts a lot of things in perspective
why enter a thread about space if you don’t care about it? Sorta weird isn’t it?
I'm saying that as in it's a big waste of money, including a lot of taxes.
 
I think that’s what is so interesting about the new wave of private companies entering the race.
Private companies that are funded by taxes. Astrobotics was funded by NASA to the tune of 200 million. That's tax money, going to a private company. To do some HECKIN SCIENCE and SCIENCE THE SHIT OUT OF THE MOON.
 
Private companies that are funded by taxes. Astrobotics was funded by NASA to the tune of 200 million. That's tax money, going to a private company. To do some HECKIN SCIENCE and SCIENCE THE SHIT OUT OF THE MOON.
 
Private companies that are funded by taxes. Astrobotics was funded by NASA to the tune of 200 million. That's tax money, going to a private company. To do some HECKIN SCIENCE and SCIENCE THE SHIT OUT OF THE MOON.
That’s a feature, not a bug. It’s a scam. Moonbois eat this shit up though. They’d pay anything, sacrifice their kids, offer their wives, you name it. All to indulge their boyhood fantasies.
 
Private companies that are funded by taxes. Astrobotics was funded by NASA to the tune of 200 million. That's tax money, going to a private company. To do some HECKIN SCIENCE and SCIENCE THE SHIT OUT OF THE MOON.

But nasa subbed it out because it’s way cheaper for them and in return, you.
 
Okay, why are the shadows intersecting instead of parallel if there is a single light source on the moon? Why are camera crosshairs covered by other objects in some photos? Why didn't they take pictures of the moon sky and stars? Why did they think less than 20 pics was sufficient to document such a monumentus event as humans walking on the moon during the apollo 11 mission? Lets start with these.
 

Similar threads

Y
Replies
14
Views
1K
JackTheBear
JackTheBear
Back
Top