VonBonfire
Well-known member
There's one guy on youtube who seems to have endless permutations of pickup comparisons. Turns out he answered half your question:
Those pickup comparisons are utterly useless.
There's one guy on youtube who seems to have endless permutations of pickup comparisons. Turns out he answered half your question:
Hmm... Is it the "m" word?Those pickup comparisons are utterly useless.
Interesting take, I can see that. I really don't like the DD, I've tried that pickup numerous times thinking it's going to be different but for a ceramic pup it's just kinda high gain blah to me. Whereas the DC is basically a hot rodded PAF with the tone. The 500 has that over the top grind but it's still got some dynamics unlike the DD. At least to my ear.I always thought the 500T sounded like a mix of the Duncan Custom and Duncan Distortion.
Yeah, I think the 500T is closer to the Custom in tone, but with output closer to the Distortion. It is like a Custom, but less refined and more wild like it has some Distortion characteristics added.Interesting take, I can see that. I really don't like the DD, I've tried that pickup numerous times thinking it's going to be different but for a ceramic pup it's just kinda high gain blah to me. Whereas the DC is basically a hot rodded PAF with the tone. The 500 has that over the top grind but it's still got some dynamics unlike the DD. At least to my ear.
On the money. I love it with a high gain amp in my Pauls because it just has so much to it but still retains some tone and harmonics. Whereas I dropped one into one of my Tremonti's and it was just a little too much.Yeah, I think the 500T is closer to the Custom in tone, but with output closer to the Distortion. It is like a Custom, but less refined and more wild like it has some Distortion characteristics added.
They are useless if you are wanting to know specifically how a pickup sounds, because a pickup on it's own has no sound.Those pickup comparisons are utterly useless.
You make a great point Dave. I listened to some of those videos to get as much info on the pickups I was hunting at the time but I find just fining someone on youtube with a remotely similar guitar and amp (if you can find it) gave me a better overall picture of how the real world tone would play out, which for me was better than just listening to different pickup EQs, which many times can be compensated for at the amp.They are useless if you are wanting to know specifically how a pickup sounds, because a pickup on it's own has no sound.
But;
The Stamper videos are very useful to reference the EQ-curve of a pickup compared to another model that a person already has.
I've found his videos very accurate to hear which of the two has more treble, more bass, more mids, ect,,,
Output does not come through the comparisons very well, or at least not as well as it would through a tube amp because that first gain stage of a good tube amp is very sensitive to output.
On the other hand, if one is going to be running boost/od pedals before their amp anyways, then the output differences and the way they affect that first 12ax7 are somewhat reduced.
I prefer the Modern Alnico or the KSE's. I have both lying around, but both are too active-sounding compared to what I'm in the mood for right now, which is a hot Ceramic passive with some aggressive mids.Actually it sounds like a Fluence Modern might be a good choice.
I don't think the SD is going to be as hot as I'd want it to. Maybe if the Invader was a bit brighter, though.Dimarzio super distortion or prs "m" Maybe even an invader...
I have a Lollar DB that doesn't read super hot on the ohmeter but has pretty high output. I lowered it way down so I could get those soulful bluesy leads, lol. Alnico 5. It's like a magnet brick. My experiment was aiming for a soulful bluesy tone using higher output pickups. It was a success as a bridge pickup though most of my work is on the neck. It really sounds sick in the bridge through through my rig. Bite, honk if you want it, just RAW.I don't think the SD is going to be as hot as I'd want it to. Maybe if the Invader was a bit brighter, though.
Man, I've tried the BW several times and can't get on with it. I was so pumped for that pup, but to me it has this inherent fuzz, or over distortion built into it. I know that's not a good way to describe it, but it was like there was just this layer of gain or something over my tone no matter what, it was weird to me.I also think the Nazgul is probably a good choice. I have pretty much every high output Duncan in different guitars. The Nazgul has the grinding upper mids and cut lower mids which make it great for Pantera and Fear Factory style playing. The Distortion is more old school with more of a chainsaw top end. The Invader is great, but can be too much. The Black Winter is nice, but kind of more compressed and squishy feeling. The Custom is aggressive, but really needs a boost.
I really liked the BW for awhile, but I have started to like pickups with a little less output. They seem to ca-chunk better, and the BW almost seems over saturated to me now. It is like it squishes so much that it seems less aggressive. The Nazgul is a little lower output than the Distortion for example, almost more like a modern JB. I do like the BW neck a lot though.Man, I've tried the BW several times and can't get on with it. I was so pumped for that pup, but to me it has this inherent fuzz, or over distortion built into it. I know that's not a good way to describe it, but it was like there was just this layer of gain or something over my tone no matter what, it was weird to me.
They are not.Those pickup comparisons are utterly useless.