Bad Brain
Well-known member
I’m six minutes in. The dude is not a deep thinker. He over simplifies complex topics and then brushes off as silly. Seems familiar ?Probably good you didn’t keep watching then. Please keep proving him right though lol
I’m six minutes in. The dude is not a deep thinker. He over simplifies complex topics and then brushes off as silly. Seems familiar ?Probably good you didn’t keep watching then. Please keep proving him right though lol
I think he's aynirar's brother-in-law, or something.I’m six minutes in. The dude is not a deep thinker. He over simplifies complex topics and then brushes off as silly. Seems familiar ?
Maybe that's actually our aynirar himself ?Like 95% of the video is just smug insults and snickers. He’s not addressed any of the evidence and analysis presented in The Dimming documentary I posted.
I’m six minutes in. The dude is not a deep thinker. He over simplifies complex topics and then brushes off as silly. Seems familiar ?
I guess it's only funny if you're retarded.It’s a comedy show. You just gotta watch it
Like 95% of the video is just smug insults and snickers. He’s not addressed any of the evidence and analysis presented in The Dimming documentary I posted.
You just have to live in realityI guess it's only funny if you're retarded.
?![]()
Anyways.. here's a quick tone test of Van Halen IIYou just have to live in reality
Anyways.. here's a quick tone test of Van Halen II
No, I truly found it distracting (And annoying). But to the point, what exactly is he arguing against? He seems to acknowledge that geoengineering programs are real, and also even that governments have tested spraying over populations. I would never try to argue motives or end goals. So are we just arguing about the scope and effect of such programs?he is self deprecating as much as he is “smug”. You just aren’t willing to see that since he also upsets you by being good at making your make-believe “evidence” sound silly, because it is. It really really is.
No, I truly found it distracting (And annoying). But to the point, what exactly is he arguing against? He seems to acknowledge that geoengineering programs are real, and also even that governments have tested spraying over populations. I would never try to argue motives or end goals. So are we just arguing about the scope and effect of such programs?
Also, one specific criticism I recall was that no one can say what they are spraying. Not true — they have performed tests. Watch the doc.
So you posted for “entertainment”? Seems like most people in the comments are snickering about Alex jones, conspiracy theories and so on. ?He isn’t trying to prove or disprove anything. It’s just entertainment. He’s an actor
Counter shows 10 plays as of this morning.
Yes it is entertainment. It’s the point of the channel. Someone who knows nothing about the “theories” does an internet search about it, and writes a script that’s read by a voice actor who also has no knowledge of the theory either.So you posted for “entertainment”? Seems like most people in the comments are snickering about Alex jones, conspiracy theories and so on. ?