Iran Just Nuked Israel WWIII Has Begun

  • Thread starter Thread starter NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
  • Start date Start date
When Trump was asked last week by a reporter publicly about Tulsi Gabbard's testimony he said, "I don't care what she said". There you go.
 
jdel77 said:
Idiot. I haven't downplayed anything. Try to keep up.
You've probably never met a Muslim in your life and think they hang upside down in their wardrobes to sleep or something similarly demented.
Click to expand...
He's just worried he's gonna get thrown off a building.
 
Bad Brain said:
Is that a good thing?
Click to expand...

Sure. He's not afraid to disagree with people and it wouldn't surprise me if she was either wrong or told what to say or didn't have all the information.

Just because you put someone in your cabinet, doesn't mean you agree with them on everything nor defend everything they say or do. Something I've appreciated from Trump since the very beginning (2017).
 
311boogieman said:
Sure. He's not afraid to disagree with people and it wouldn't surprise me if she was either wrong or told what to say or didn't have all the information.

Just because you put someone in your cabinet, doesn't mean you agree with them on everything nor defend everything they say or do. Something I've appreciated from Trump since the very beginning (2017).
Click to expand...
I agree in general but in this case what info was he was going off that overrode her and the IC's assessment?
 
Bad Brain said:
I agree in general but in this case what info was he was going off that overrode her and the IC's assessment?
Click to expand...
How the fuck are we, people on a music website, supposed to know what info the prez has?
Imagine how important you must think you are. Should the president be checking with bad brain first before making all of his decisions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsm
Robostyle said:
How the fuck are we, people on a music website, supposed to know what info the prez has?
Imagine how important you must think you are. Should the president be checking with bad brain first before making all of his decisions?
Click to expand...
The president should justify to the American people a decision as significant as attacking a foreign nation. Not a 'trust me bro' ESPESCIALLY in the face of going against the IC's assessment. You fauxtards are so predictable and easily manipulated.

 
Bad Brain said:
The president should justify to the American people a decision as significant as attacking a foreign nation.
Click to expand...
But not Democrat presidents, apparently. Clinton and Obama and Biden never did.
Curiouser and curiouser
 
Robostyle said:
How the fuck are we, people on a music website, supposed to know what info the prez has?
Imagine how important you must think you are. Should the president be checking with bad brain first before making all of his decisions?
Click to expand...

Even if libtards had the same information they'd still find a way to ignore it, or screw up how they use it, and causing self-destruction
 
Robostyle said:
But not Democrat presidents, apparently. Clinton and Obama and Biden never did.
Curiouser and curiouser
Click to expand...
They should have as well. You guys have to quit playing team-sport politics. It rots the brain.
 
JDs Couch said:
Evidence proves that the US is the ONLY country on earth to ever drop a nuclear weapon on a civilian population.
Click to expand...
No one (libtards) ever follows this statement up with "and saving the lives of as many as 1 million US soldiers and sailors". they always forget that part.
 
Bad Brain said:
Funny coming from a citizen of the only country on flat earth that has ever unleashed a nuke on a civilian population.
Click to expand...
Weird...i found the exact same comment in another thread and they also left out the very important ending to that statement: "to save an estimated million lives of US soldiers and sailors." An important exclusion.
 
84superchamp said:
Weird...i found the exact same comment in another thread and they also left out the very important ending to that statement: "to save an estimated million lives of US soldiers and sailors." An important exclusion.
Click to expand...
That's the idea yeah. Every group of people that commit an atrocity have a good reason in their own minds for it. Do you think the Nazis and the German population that supported them thought they were doing evil? No one ever thinks they are the ones doing evil. It's always rationalized, justified.
 
84superchamp said:
No one (libtards) ever follows this statement up with "and saving the lives of as many as 1 million US soldiers and sailors". they always forget that part.
Click to expand...
See, we had to slaughter over 200,000 innocent civilians, because...errr...reasons.
 
The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons ... The lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.

— Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman, 1950,
 
The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan.

— Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet,
 
The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all.

— Major General Curtis LeMay, XXI Bomber Command, September 1945,

The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment ... It was a mistake to ever drop it ... [the scientists] had this toy and they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it.

— Fleet Admiral William Halsey Jr., 1946,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top