NAD Rev E chrome face

[Wizard of Ozz]

They have the same Rectifier DNA, but the C is a bit more aggressive, with a bit more mids and grind and gain, while the E was a bit more scooped and softer sounding. But just a tiny bit. The low end on the Rev C was also a hair tighter than the more pillowy low end of the Rev E.
Here is an A/B of both:




Mine was #0590

Rev C for the win. Best Rectos ever made. Hands down.

 

[LPMojoGL]

They have the same Rectifier DNA, but the C is a bit more aggressive, with a bit more mids and grind and gain, while the E was a bit more scooped and softer sounding. But just a tiny bit. The low end on the Rev C was also a hair tighter than the more pillowy low end of the Rev E.
Here is an A/B of both:




Mine was #0590

Rev C has that mid grind, but I'm really digging Rev E here. What a sound.
I don't miss my Rev F. I don't miss my Rev F. I don't miss my Rev F.
I miss my Rev F.

 

[Bram576]

Rev C has that mid grind, but I'm really digging Rev E here. What a sound.
I don't miss my Rev F. I don't miss my Rev F. I don't miss my Rev F.
I miss my Rev F.

I honestly like the E the most out of any of the revisions. They have that grunt the Fs do but that brightness and shimmer like the Cs.

 

[BesaMoogie]

They have the same Rectifier DNA, but the C is a bit more aggressive, with a bit more mids and grind and gain, while the E was a bit more scooped and softer sounding. But just a tiny bit. The low end on the Rev C was also a hair tighter than the more pillowy low end of the Rev E.
Here is an A/B of both:




Mine was #0590

I am stalking the amp

 

[SBlue]

I am stalking the amp

That's the one!