donny dont wannie

  • Thread starter Thread starter shar-vell Dan
  • Start date Start date
Those arrests aren't "the norm" AFAICT.

If you're wearing masks for all the heavy-duty arrests, you still wouldn't want to take 'em off for "less-dangerous" ones 'cause you'd still be outing yourself to those with nefarious intentions.

So IMHO still makes 100% sense. It's a job; you wanna be able to go home to the missus at the end of the working day after all.
 
Monkey Man said:
Those arrests aren't "the norm" AFAICT.

If you're wearing masks for all the heavy-duty arrests, you still wouldn't want to take 'em off for "less-dangerous" ones 'cause you'd still be outing yourself to those with nefarious intentions.

So IMHO still makes 100% sense. It's a job; you wanna be able to go home to the missus at the end of the working day after all.
Click to expand...
65 Percent of People Taken by ICE Had No Convictions, 93 Percent No Violent Convictions

New data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) indicate that the government is primarily detaining individuals with no criminal convictions of any kind. Also, among those with criminal convictions, they are overwhelmingly not the violent offenses that ICE continuously uses to justify its deportation agenda. ICE has shared this data with people outside the agency, who shared the numbers with the Cato Institute.

As of June 14, ICE had booked into detention 204,297 individuals (since October 1, 2024, the start of fiscal year 2025). Of those book-ins, 65 percent, or 133,687 individuals, had no criminal convictions. Moreover, more than 93 percent of ICE book-ins were never convicted of any violent offenses. About nine in ten had no convictions for violent or property offenses. Most convictions (53 percent) fell into three main categories: immigration, traffic, or nonviolent vice crimes. The appendix table at the end of this post has data by detailed crime and broad crime categorization.
 
@JDs Couch

Our discussion is about the masks and I stand by the fact that I think it's a sensible move under the circumstances, regardless of the exact proportions.

All it takes is 1 nut job mate and the missus could be having dinner on her lonesome.
 
nTzJgWx.jpg
 
JDs Couch said:
65 Percent of People Taken by ICE Had No Convictions, 93 Percent No Violent Convictions

New data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) indicate that the government is primarily detaining individuals with no criminal convictions of any kind. Also, among those with criminal convictions, they are overwhelmingly not the violent offenses that ICE continuously uses to justify its deportation agenda. ICE has shared this data with people outside the agency, who shared the numbers with the Cato Institute.

As of June 14, ICE had booked into detention 204,297 individuals (since October 1, 2024, the start of fiscal year 2025). Of those book-ins, 65 percent, or 133,687 individuals, had no criminal convictions. Moreover, more than 93 percent of ICE book-ins were never convicted of any violent offenses. About nine in ten had no convictions for violent or property offenses. Most convictions (53 percent) fell into three main categories: immigration, traffic, or nonviolent vice crimes. The appendix table at the end of this post has data by detailed crime and broad crime categorization.
Click to expand...


Anyone in the USA illegally is an invader. We're deporting invaders.

So easy, even a Canadastan woke useless idiot can understand.
 
Monkey Man said:
Those arrests aren't "the norm" AFAICT.

If you're wearing masks for all the heavy-duty arrests, you still wouldn't want to take 'em off for "less-dangerous" ones 'cause you'd still be outing yourself to those with nefarious intentions.

So IMHO still makes 100% sense. It's a job; you wanna be able to go home to the missus at the end of the working day after all.
Click to expand...
ICE agents are also in the category of the protective witness program, just like those who testify against organized crime members. Those who would like to identify them and do them in are very similar...it isn't your standard LEO job, not by a long shot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top