
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Dan seems to be conflating circular reasoning with circular arguments. I guess it's sorta understandable since people tend to confuse the two. He also does both.
Circular reasoning - using the thing you're trying to prove as part of the proof.
Circular argument - Arguing for the sake of arguing and not having a point. Also known as arguing in circles.
There's an example of Dan using circular reasoning.
-Robo is an alt because Dan thinks he's an alt.
-If Dan thinks he's an alt then Robo is an alt.
Correct that that would be circular reasoning, but incorrect as to why I think he’s an alt. This is how misinformation is spread
Circular argument would be what Floyd just admitted to doing. He says he barely reads what I post yet he will comment and disagree with every single thing I say.
Weird, obsessive and circular