so, in the grand scheme things (particularly if you didn't have side-by-side) you think a MK3 would capably cover whatever one might be getting out of a Mk2?
put another way, there isn't anything in general that a Mk2 gives that a Mk3 couldn't?
I have done some research into prior posts but wondering if there are any 'updated', additional thoughts on how the current MK3 compares to the prior MK2?
What makes me wonder if I should actually seek out the prior version vs the current is I am not into the heavier modern metal tones.
I...
This actually reeks to me of trying to design to a price point…unlike Marks of years past where they were constantly incorporating new features…I am the most butthurt by the single GEQ, just f’ing dumb when you’ve got the JP-2C feature set sitting right there
I spent a couple weeks with a 120…I wanted to like it soooo much - the feature set, flexibility, range…everything.
It was pretty cool - could access a lot of different tones and tweak as much as could be desired. At the end of the day, though, other than that flexibility/versatility nothing...