in the spirit of extending an olive branch, you can bow out at any time and we’ll (I’ll) cut some slack. If you want to persist with your ignorant, misinformed rhetoric, game on…
Here’s your opening 🤷
I’m about as far from “WokeMericans”, whatever the hell that means, than you realize. You’re ignorant, you post stupid partisan shit non-stop and appear to have zero awareness of your stupidity… 🤷
Seriously, dude what the actual fuck are you going on about? Show me where "Neil DeAss Tyson" said that figuring averages came after calculus, or wolves came after dogs, or whatever other stupid reverse algorithm shit you are claiming. You have a brake light out, dawg, Stay down...
Yes, you are. No, I won't. And I'm comfortable taking "Neil DeAss Tyson's" opinion/statement over yours any/every time.
Do yourself a favor and re-read some of your posts. You might mean well, but your ignorance is absolutely astounding. You sound like someone from California :)
In all seriousness, what the actual fuck are you saying?
Point 1: "But he fools a lot of people...... and a lot of average people into thinking he is smart".
So, me and others, are "average" and are fooled into thinking he is smart? Please explain. Point me to one of your Ted Talks to...
I don't disagree. He would be best served sticking to science topics and avoiding anything that could be remotely construed as "political" or partisan. The man is stupid smart - he should stick to his strengths (in my opinion) ...
"No offense" - which, if you're not clear on this, means I don't care if it offends you... I find your incessant posting of copy/pasta talking points with made-up terms and name-calling, coupled with your obvious ignorance and complete lack of awareness, absolutely fascinating. In my defense...
Once again, specifically, how did Nixon do “whatever it takes in the best interest of Americans…”. You’re long on platitudes and incredibly short on substance. I ask again - do you know anything about the man or his administration?
You’re calling both Reagan and Nixon “great men”? Based on what criteria? Reagan was a decent president but surely made mistakes. Nixon was a crooked POS. What makes him great in your mind? Be specific. Use real words and try to articulate your thoughts at something north of a 7th grade level...
He actually was about half bad. Revisionist history touts his accomplishments but in retrospect, he failed about as much as he succeeded. He was likable, which certainly helps prop up the legacy. Surviving an assassination attempt doesn’t hurt, either.
You’ve touted with pride numerous times...
Again, self-edit. You could have stopped after “…Im not the smartest guy in the room”. Curious, does your phone not have auto-correct? Of an apostrophe key? 🤷