CAMERON CCM 100 Clips...

  • Thread starter Thread starter dawnofdreamx97
  • Start date Start date
dawnofdreamx97

dawnofdreamx97

Well-known member
Ok.... FINALLY back and revised!

I used a bunch of different mics this time around .. this amp is so versatile, i love it! it sounds so massive in person...


http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/1.wav Heavy channel 2 clip w/ sm57
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/2.wav Heavy channel 2 clip w/ sm57
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/3.wav Heavy channel 2 clip w/ sm57
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/4.wav Hi gain channel 2 w/ sm57
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/5.wav channel 1 clean w/ sm57
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/6.wav heavy channel 2 w/ u87
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/7.wav channel 2 less gain w/ u87
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/8.wav channel 2 rock and roll w/ u87
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/9.wav channel 2 and 1 with punch dip switch in middle , low gain w/ u87
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/10.wav channel 2 going through the different modes and dip switches, and moving mic placement towards end, audix d3 left, md421 right
http://www.sicksdeep.com/ccm2/11.wav clean channel 1 w channel 1 gain cranked for lead, w sm57
 
nah..... I like the .wav cause I can actually listen here at work, they have .mp3 blocked.



sounds kickass by the way..... I'd KILL for a CCV-100
 
How loud was the amp when you recorded? Where was the master set?
 
Thanks!

I recorded it damn loud id say the master volumes were at about 11 oclock....
 
hmmm, doesn't sound very good to me. A little fizzy and sort of harsh. I can hear it in the clean channel, too. Sort of thin, with a lack of any mid-range definition. But, that can be from any number of things: how it was EQ'd, the speakers, the guitar, and/or the recording process.

So, I can't really say that I enjoyed how the amp sounds from these clips.

Thanks for the effort, though.
 
FourT6and2":1p85dbbf said:
hmmm, doesn't sound very good to me. A little fizzy and sort of harsh.

...

Thanks for the effort, though.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately I agree. :cry:
 
Yeah it definately could have been the speakers not being broken in but that tone really did nothing for me at all. :no:
 
It was def mic placement, gonna re do it tonight....
 
dawnofdreamx97":3enfhbsg said:
It was def mic placement, gonna re do it tonight....
Click to expand...
That could definatley be it. I typically do several takes on seperate tracks with different mic placements to see where it sounds the best an compare tracks using my ear. I also listen to the recorded track and try and decide if it needs more or less in the eq and I eq from the amp which a lot of times doesnt sound like I want it to in the room but sounds much better in the recording. Alot of times I mix my 57 with mt e609. I like the tones I get that way.
 
ejecta":3fyvz6xp said:
Alot of times I mix my 57 with mt e609. I like the tones I get that way.
Click to expand...
+1! I use those two exact mics at the same time with great results.
 
8th clip sounds like you have a phase issue :confused:

Listened to most and it sounds good!
Very tight.


EDIT: That phase thing happens with u87 I think. You have it in other u87 clips also.
 
For something recorded with a single 57 that sounded pretty damn good :thumbsup:
 
They sound great to me :thumbsup: Should sound great in the mix, would like to hear that actually :)
 
i guess that in a buzy mix they would sound great.. but alone i find them a little thin, harsh and fizzy.. i believe that is a bad mic placement that causes this..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top