
Docster
Member
Am looking at these two pedals for clean boost. And I've got to say that the added mid-boost makes the Koko very attractive. How does the clean boost on the Koko compare to the MK 4.23?
You know, it would be way more useful tho if both boosts had their own separate outputs.Kapo_Polenton":36g730co said:i've got a koko on it's way to me but i want it for the mid boost. Can't really go wrong with two boost functions in one box though!
guitarman967":396h641q said:You know, it would be way more useful tho if both boosts had their own separate outputs.Kapo_Polenton":396h641q said:i've got a koko on it's way to me but i want it for the mid boost. Can't really go wrong with two boost functions in one box though!
I love the Koko's clean boost side for hitting the poweramp a bit harder in the FX loop. In
that application however, you lose out on using the MID side up front and it sounds like holy hell in the loop.![]()
So, I'm probably gonna grab the ISO as long as it's close to the sound of Koko's clean side.
Business":3ng78txv said:As usual, people have owned either one of the 2, not both, and are recommending the one they own
How helpful
I own the Koko, it's good
I haven't owned the MK 4.23
Hence, I can't compare both
Inca Roads":1nx88vpw said:Business":1nx88vpw said:As usual, people have owned either one of the 2, not both, and are recommending the one they own
How helpful
I own the Koko, it's good
I haven't owned the MK 4.23
Hence, I can't compare both
As Usual.....![]()
To clarify, I've owned both and sent
the Koko on its way.
The Koko is Great...just not what I
needed, the Mk.4:23 covered what I
needed better.