Diezel Paul Clean

[duesentrieb]

Just clean, thats all . . .
Most pots noon except mids (20%), treble/bass around 60%. Incl. Paul's reverb (50%), TC Ditto and a Mooer Echolizer in front of the amp. 2x12" V30 cab.

Stupid noodling, Knopfler for the poor if you want.

I just love Paul's clean sound . . .

 

[duesentrieb]

Thanks Reza.

Guitar into TC looper into Mooer Echolizer into Paul. 2 V30 cab.

Three mics, SM57, E906 and a Sperlux. Into a MOTU 4 Pre,
SM and Superlux Stereo, the E906 added in mono. Mix into Mac, where
a cam app records direct (unfortunately I cannot switch off the autofocus on the cam).
File normalized to 0dB. Thats all.

Olaf

 

[Drew]

Sounds great Olaf!

 

[rickenbacker198]

Beautiful sound!!

It sounds really close to the Schmidt, how's the feel?

 

[jape23]

That was nice! The Paul has a killer clean channel, from ultra clean to gritty. Sounds great no matter how you set the drive on channel one.

 

[duesentrieb]

Thanks Drew, rick and littleguitars.

As littleguitars said, gain and vol set to noon gives this sound, gain dimed a nice crunchy blues sound.
IMO it is close to the responsiveness of Schmidt regarding the clean. Plus the other channels and the features are a step further.
Channel 2 is 800s to hotrod territory and channel 3 a nicely singing lead.

 

[Speeddemon]

How would you compare the Paul to the D-Moll?

 

[duesentrieb]

D-Moll 100 Watt, Midcut
Paul, 50 Watt, Reverb

IMO biggest difference are the transformers. Also the reverb (digital) changes the amount of signal going into the poweramp (less for Paul, even when reverb is off, I need to adjust the input level on my Intellifex when switching between the two, not a huge difference).
Paul sounds a bit "sweeter" if that makes sense. Paul can do metal, but of course DMoll's Midcut helps a lot, you know.

 

[Speeddemon]

D-Moll 100 Watt, Midcut
Paul, 50 Watt, Reverb

IMO biggest difference are the transformers. Also the reverb (digital) changes the amount of signal going into the poweramp (less for Paul, even when reverb is off, I need to adjust the input level on my Intellifex when switching between the two, not a huge difference).
Paul sounds a bit "sweeter" if that makes sense. Paul can do metal, but of course DMoll's Midcut helps a lot, you know.

Interesting.

My biggest gripe with the D-Moll was the low-mid saturation in Channel 3. Channel 2 was great and the Clean was like top 3 material...Really good.
If the Paul can sound tighter and clearer than the D-Moll with higher gain, that'd be great.

 

[duesentrieb]

Current models (both amps) are voiced a bit different to get rid of that lower mid thing at higher gain.

If you are more into metal, I'd try a DMoll current version.

 

[Altamir]

Sounds nice!

Would you mind sharing a comparison video between the two amps?

 

[duesentrieb]

What would you like me to compare exactly?

 

[RayBergy]

Current protein powders for muscle gain models (both amps) are voiced a bit different to get rid of that lower mid thing at higher gain.

If you are more into metal, I'd try a DMoll current version.

Sounds great. I might get this.

 

[duesentrieb]

Do you know these already?

 

[Gutmann]

And this will help to translate franconian dialect:

http://www.deanita.de/franconia_englishspoken.htm