
splawner":2jasrxv5 said:I have a new production CCV and love the amp and i know i can get the same tones out of mine that is in the Video you posted....I also had an original CCV and would say i like the new production CCV's for my liking a bit better... I feel my CCV has a bit more gain on the mid clipping channel than my old one had which works for me....Bottom line IMO just killer amps![]()
jcj":1snoh3a8 said:splawner":1snoh3a8 said:I have a new production CCV and love the amp and i know i can get the same tones out of mine that is in the Video you posted....I also had an original CCV and would say i like the new production CCV's for my liking a bit better... I feel my CCV has a bit more gain on the mid clipping channel than my old one had which works for me....Bottom line IMO just killer amps![]()
It definitely has more gain on the mid clipping, and the feel is more saturated.
I guess I'd say that particular CCV, or most of the old ones I've owned or played have almost a clean channel running behind them....really hard to explain, but you'd know it if you felt it...
I like 'em both![]()
SLOgriff":2u8v4jgx said:What do you mean by "among some other things ..... "![]()
So the new CCV's can be dialed in to sound like this original one in the video?
SLOgriff":33yw2apq said:What do you mean by "among some other things ..... "![]()
So the new CCV's can be dialed in to sound like this original one in the video?
steve_k":1sdnetaf said:SLOgriff":1sdnetaf said:What do you mean by "among some other things ..... "![]()
So the new CCV's can be dialed in to sound like this original one in the video?
They are not the same.
steve_k":bpeilj07 said:Just like some of the original Marshall's are a little different, because they were trying to buy what components they could in the UK with a war going on. Mark's inconsistency on the original CCV's was the same. Mark is a tweaker and builds from what he hears. There's probably not two of the same.
The CCV without any clipping, actually makes very minimal tube gain. Two tubes for each channel isn't going to bring about a large amount of gain. But, as Josh said, the overall tone with the clipping engaged is almost like layering the clipping on top of the cleaner, lower gain tube tone. This is what gives the CCV so much punch. And, the more you crank it, the tighter it gets.
All that said, I leaned toward Mark's modded Marshall's for the tone and feel that I wanted. Still, they are fine amps and indeed, most are different. And, there are going to be subtle differences in the production models over the originals.
Steve
Tone Merchant":67ntvud7 said:now this blog is what rig talk is supposed to be about. A mature discussion from guys who have alot of knowledge and insight.
keep this going
steve_k":33h1pshk said:Just like some of the original Marshall's are a little different, because they were trying to buy what components they could in the UK with a war going on. Mark's inconsistency on the original CCV's was the same. Mark is a tweaker and builds from what he hears. There's probably not two of the same.
The CCV without any clipping, actually makes very minimal tube gain. Two tubes for each channel isn't going to bring about a large amount of gain. But, as Josh said, the overall tone with the clipping engaged is almost like layering the clipping on top of the cleaner, lower gain tube tone. This is what gives the CCV so much punch. And, the more you crank it, the tighter it gets.
All that said, I leaned toward Mark's modded Marshall's for the tone and feel that I wanted. Still, they are fine amps and indeed, most are different. And, there are going to be subtle differences in the production models over the originals.
Steve