thegame":2sw1d5ll said:
Shask":2sw1d5ll said:
I recently got a Duncan Distortion, and I have been experimenting with it a lot. I am normally an EMG person, so it is a change from what I am used to...
How do you find the DD compared to EMGs (81) ? Funny question in that EMGs replaced the DD in my guitar 5 years ago, but I'm comtemplating trying out the DD again, since I still have it. I replaced the Duncans, not out of dissatisfaction, just to experiment. Now I can't remember very well how they sounded.
I had a DD like 8-9 years ago, and just wanted a refresher also, lol.
I have been using the EMG 85 and 707 a lot more lately over the 81 just because I have been wanting a bigger bottom end in my guitars. I generally use boosts, so I can clean up the low end if I need to.
I just plugged in both back to back for a second to give it some thought. The DD definitely has more lows and low mids. It can get sludgy on the lows if your amp doesn't compensate for that (Or you use a Tubescreamer or similar). The DD has a lot of upper mids like the 81, but the 81 has more presence, so the 81 sounds brighter overall. The DD has upper mids, but then not much presence, so overall it doesn't sound as excessively bright, or have as much edge to the attack. The DD is smoother and more dynamic. I don't like super smooth pickups, but the DD is a nice balance in the middle. It is not as bad as a JB, which I consider to be flubby and too smooth.
I don't think the DD.....stands out as much as an EMG, but it is a good sounding pickup nontheless. I think I prefer the 85, but I definitely like the change. It is nice to have something that is not 100% super aggressive all the time.