
BrentSP
Active member
The odds of this ever happening are probably never........... Eddie is banking with is own EVH brand right now but can you imagine the potential this amp could have as long as he stuck to his vintage tone? I think Dave would probably be pulling his hair out working with Ed but it would be quite the experience.
I'm afraid that Ed most likely would probably want another highly complicated 3 channel "too much" gain monster. Ed has stated many times in the past that his methodology has been "less is more" but he doesn't seem to apply that to his amps in the last 18 years due to marketing demands I'm sure.
If I was dreaming, I'm guessing his basis for a lead tone would either be the HBE or a tweaked BE channel for more gain. I don't see him going for a fixed diode SAT but he very well could.
Has Ed ever played any of Friedman's current line or maybe a Marsha in the past? I would think he'd be over the moon if he did. I've been through a large army of amps over the years and Bogner has been my main stay for quite some time but in the past year when I tried my first Friedman, I was astounded. Its just in my wheel house of tone and a overall amp.
I'm afraid that Ed most likely would probably want another highly complicated 3 channel "too much" gain monster. Ed has stated many times in the past that his methodology has been "less is more" but he doesn't seem to apply that to his amps in the last 18 years due to marketing demands I'm sure.
If I was dreaming, I'm guessing his basis for a lead tone would either be the HBE or a tweaked BE channel for more gain. I don't see him going for a fixed diode SAT but he very well could.
Has Ed ever played any of Friedman's current line or maybe a Marsha in the past? I would think he'd be over the moon if he did. I've been through a large army of amps over the years and Bogner has been my main stay for quite some time but in the past year when I tried my first Friedman, I was astounded. Its just in my wheel house of tone and a overall amp.