
SpiderWars
Well-known member
Interesting pickup info and more variac fun.
I get ya. The VH-II tone definitely came across as having less ‘sizzle’ and for sure, Ed’s effects were not as pronounced on VH-II as they were on the first album. But that said, there is something warmer, darker, more ‘organic’ more ‘woody’ about the VH-II tones than the sizzlier, gainier, ‘nastier‘ tones on the first album.Why do most Ed fans target his VH II guitar tone? In terms of DLR era tones, VH II was his least impressive.
I don't understand what he meant there. Those speakers weren't made yet when Fair Warning was recorded.Biggest surprise to me was the use of the G12t-75's in the cab. To me they were always harsh and grating, but with the Marshall so spongey with the Variac it makes sense to add some cut and clarity to things.
...internet.I don't understand what he meant there. Those speakers weren't made yet when Fair Warning was recorded.
Good sleuthing Sherlock Spider....I don't understand what he meant there. Those speakers weren't made yet when Fair Warning was recorded.
He seems to capture the specific Fair Warning tone somehow doesn't he?I've experimented with Ed's alleged 90VAC line-in protocol... I call BS. I also owned a Mojave "Dirty Boy" head w/onboard variac, dedicated tube heater xformer and on-the-fly biasing. To my ears, Ed was running his rig between 110VAC and 115VAC. Using a variac doesn't affect tone at all. It creates attack and release time latency via slowed capacitor recharge time. The "magic" we're hearing on VH I was created using Ed's hands and excessive power tube compression.
I can't tell using my laptop speakers. I'll check it out later using my JBL speaker.He seems to capture the specific Fair Warning tone somehow doesn't he?
I enjoy this guys forays into the lore and he has methodical mind and reason for his experimentation.