Gibson LP vs Carvin CS6

  • Thread starter Thread starter yngzaklynch
  • Start date Start date
yngzaklynch":1waqmw2x said:
http://www.carvinguitars.com/isa/process/getGuitarsByModelID.php?model=cs6

Who has played both? Thoughts on their differences and similarities as far as tone, sustain, playability, weight/comfort and overall build quality???
I haven't had the pleasure of playing a top-line Carvin custom, but everytime I go to their site, I wonder why I haven't pulled the trigger on one of their beauties :yes:

Peace,
Mojo :thumbsup:
 
Haven't played those back to back, but the Carvin guitars I have were just awesome and felt so great.
 
I'll late you know in late September....I have an LP...and my CS6 is scheduled to be completed on Sept 20th (my 30th bday oddly enough)
 
Dimebag11":4y4kk8pj said:
I'll late you know in late September....I have an LP...and my CS6 is scheduled to be completed on Sept 20th (my 30th bday oddly enough)


Which finish did you choose if you don't mind me asking?
 
I got a medium quilt top in the triple step moss green finish.
 
Dimebag11":2pb8nlpq said:
I got a medium quilt top in the triple step moss green finish.


Should be killer looking. My emerald green EBMM JP6 BFR looks sweet. Loves me some great on figured maple. What makes a quilt medium? Figure width?
 
Yea, figure width....got it with gold hardware, dark rosewood board, abalone block inlays, black/white zebra pickups, SS frets, 12" Radius. Clear gloss finish in the back.
 
I love my carvins. The carved top necks are a bit different (and thicker) than the DC necks, but they still play great. I've never been a LP kinda guy, so I of course prefer playing my CT4 over my singers LP Standard. I have been thinking about getting a CS lately too, they look great and would be a nice alternative to an LP.
 
I find it a little odd that they won't dye their ebony. The brown streaks make the guitar look less appealing.
 
I own a couple LP's and a few Carvins -2 CS guitars. I haven't really played the LPs too much since getting the Carvins. Better necks, plays like butter and sounds excellent ( I did swap out pickups). I really like the Carvins. Do they sound like an LP, not really but similar. They have 25" necks and a thinner body that the Gibson's. More like a PRS tonally.
 
muudrock":1hv9ebj2 said:
I own a couple LP's and a few Carvins -2 CS guitars. I haven't really played the LPs too much since getting the Carvins. Better necks, plays like butter and sounds excellent ( I did swap out pickups). I really like the Carvins. Do they sound like an LP, not really but similar. They have 25" necks and a thinner body that the Gibson's. More like a PRS tonally.


Thanks. Hmmmmmm
 
can't comment on the cs6, but regarding carvin.. i played 2 bolts, a bolt plus, and a dc400 this weekend. i didn't plug any in, but the craftsmanship seemed top notch for all.

the necks weren't ibanez thin, but they were very fast necks. I really liked playing them. would i spend $1000ish for a new bolt? no, when $1000 can get a very nice strat. for $450ish, used, i think the bolts are great guitars. i like heavy guitars and the carvins feel light. my concern is that they may sound thin when amplified.

i'd like to check out a cs6 to see what the top-of-the-line carvins are all about.
 
Dimebag11":28sdpoq4 said:
Yea, figure width....got it with gold hardware, dark rosewood board, abalone block inlays, black/white zebra pickups, SS frets, 12" Radius. Clear gloss finish in the back.
Dibs :yes: ;)
 
I've had LP's before and never held on to them. I've had my Carvin CT3 for a couple of years now and it's not going anywhere. Carvin makes great guitars. Gibson makes inconsistent, overpriced guitars.
 
Lord Toneking":vmgrt15k said:
Dimebag11":vmgrt15k said:
Yea, figure width....got it with gold hardware, dark rosewood board, abalone block inlays, black/white zebra pickups, SS frets, 12" Radius. Clear gloss finish in the back.
Dibs :yes: ;)

I'll keep that in mind ;) Although, if it doesn't trump my LP Studio then it's getting sent back within those 10 days lol :rock:
 
Gitfiddler":7d7hz37d said:
can't comment on the cs6, but regarding carvin.. i played 2 bolts, a bolt plus, and a dc400 this weekend. i didn't plug any in, but the craftsmanship seemed top notch for all.

the necks weren't ibanez thin, but they were very fast necks. I really liked playing them. would i spend $1000ish for a new bolt? no, when $1000 can get a very nice strat. for $450ish, used, i think the bolts are great guitars. i like heavy guitars and the carvins feel light. my concern is that they may sound thin when amplified.

i'd like to check out a cs6 to see what the top-of-the-line carvins are all about.

I haven't played their bolt series. But I own two DC's and a CT. The DC are definitely lighter and have the thinner necks. The CT weights a bit more and has a fatter neck than the DC's, could be since it's set neck too, not neck-thru. All three of my Carvins I bought used for $4-500. Great bargains. Not good for people that buy new though.
 
Tone Zone":2kowedlf said:
I've had LP's before and never held on to them. I've had my Carvin CT3 for a couple of years now and it's not going anywhere. Carvin makes great guitars. Gibson makes inconsistent, overpriced guitars.
Tone Zone your post count is so metal right now (666) :lol: :LOL: . Anyway, I'm pretty interested in these carvin singlecuts also. Never played one but they are awesome looking and I only hear great things about them. May have to take the leap for one for my next guitar. Will have to wait until February or something when I get my tax returns in though... :doh: :doh: :doh: .
 
I've owned many les pauls but always ended up ditching them in the end. What i've found is that I like playing a les paul sitting down and on the lower register but to me the upper fret access is crap (even on there axcess model) and i'm very dissapointed with gibsons quality, they generally 9 times out of 10 have the nuts cut to low which causes frets 1-3 to buzz no matter what, (even with the new plek system in place) The factory setups are usually good for a slide player! and ive seen so many microphonic pickups lately its unreal! and don't even get me started about the broken head stock issue. Gibsons customer service sucks and god forbid you ever have an issue. In my opinion , gibson aint the company it used to be and a company like Carvin slaughters there quality and customer service, and you can make a guitar to YOUR specs at a price you can afford, right here in the good ol USA.

I've owned my cs6 and dc127 carvins for a while now and just put in an order for a walnut/ maple ultra v in tung oil finish! which will be my third Carvin. I'm really happy with carvins products, they make a very nice instrument right out of the box. They stay in tune, they are setup EXCELLENT right out of the box, very stable high quality guitar to YOUR specs not someone elses, and to me that means the world.

As far as a direct comparison of the two guitars, i can tell you this,The les paul has a much louder acoustic property to it, and i believe that to be because they are chambered and have more of a break angle on the headstock and bridge. The carvin is a much more mellow sounding guitar unplugged but has really opened up over the passed few months of playing it. The neck on the carvin is really comfortable and somewhere between and 50's and 60's neck gibson style. There is always the option 50 stuff which means they can pretty much do anything you want. The word is that they have a bunch of different neck profiles scanned in from actual guitars...

The recessed bridge on the carvin is a really great idea and man can you ever get the action low if you want on it, i've never played a guitar that played so well and was so SMOOTH and easy to bend. I'd say the carvin is a mixture of a les paul and a PRS. Being a 25" scale guitar and all....

As far as plugged in , i just wrapped up tracking my bands new cd (you guys will here it soon ccv / carvin content!) and the other guitar player used and SG and we also used my Bass players les paul silverburst showcase edition. Going to tape, the carvin cut through better and just had more punch and clarity. The gibsons were muddy in comparison, the carvin breaths fire.

So to me, the Carvin is a faster supercharged version of a les paul with better playability and the best upper fret access in the business period. You can get your hand passed the last fret with the way they designed the heel. I recommend the 14 inch radius, its killer and I really hope they come out with a 24 fret version of the carvin cs6 to! Pretty amazing stuff, combine that with the fact they are totally customizable to your specs and needs, use killer locking sperzel tuners, graphtech nut, saddles, gotoh bridges, incredible fret work, bookmatching, wood choices, insane action, features, and price.... whats not to like? Plus they are made here in the usa...

Gibson is dead to me .... they are slow playing dinosaurs , and accessible only to the big boy guitar player kinda company, and they proved that to me time and time again in real life. They could give two shits about guys like you and me! They could take a lesson or two about customer service and what a custom shop really is, without leaving the hardworking american walking away like they got gaped / atm'd .....

Here is a pic of the finish on my carvin, this isn't actually my guitar but it looks exactly like it minus the floyd...
 
I ordered a CS6 and hated it so I returned it. Yea, the quality is great and so is the customer service. But that hardly matters when a guitar sounds like shit. Compared to my LP's, all I can say is the finish sounds three feet thick. It sounded like mud. Almost like someone threw a blanket over my amp. I even tried swapping pickups and still no luck. If you do decide to buy one, go used. Like all Cavin stuff their resale is horrible. Just my two cents.
 
Back
Top