
CaseyCor":1g7g9nmx said:85 in the bridge FTW. That's what I used in LP's for years.
You sir, are an asshole.locoed":394m1hjj said:Got em,love them,in my 1984 Explorer,alder wood.Hetfield replica,not the reissue.
They sound clear like the 81,they have nice attack,but the thing i like the most is
they don't have the thinness of the 81,and they sound wide open and not compressed.
And the mad tight crunch is fluid,the GB and E strings sound more full when soloing.
And they look great,i'll take a pic when it comes back,getting a re-fret.
locoed":1o9g9m2i said:Got em,love them,in my 1984 Explorer,alder wood.Hetfield replica,not the reissue.
They sound clear like the 81,they have nice attack,but the thing i like the most is
they don't have the thinness of the 81,and they sound wide open and not compressed.
And the mad tight crunch is fluid,the GB and E strings sound more full when soloing.
And they look great,i'll take a pic when it comes back,getting a re-fret.
duodecim":1g1acoj6 said:Bit disappointing to see James Hetfield do a commercial though, even if it is for his "own" pickup. Part of why I loved Metallica as a teen was the all black, no labels, no bullshit, no compromise and no commercial attitude.
But since he's been using EMG pickups, I guess it had to come one day... At least it's not as bizar as John Cleese doing a commercial for an electronics chain in Finland.![]()
Bare Knuckles aren't actives though.7slinger":lg4t57vs said:nothing against the pups, as I haven't heard them yet
...but I just watched 8mins of video, and no sound clips? at least compare them to 81s or something
bare knuckles have had covers. for a while. vintage looking ones.
locoed":3jnpqfar said:Got em,love them,in my 1984 Explorer,alder wood.Hetfield replica,not the reissue.
They sound clear like the 81,they have nice attack,but the thing i like the most is
they don't have the thinness of the 81,and they sound wide open and not compressed.
And the mad tight crunch is fluid,the GB and E strings sound more full when soloing.
And they look great,i'll take a pic when it comes back,getting a re-fret.
madrigal77":dypuilhi said:Bare Knuckles aren't actives though.7slinger":dypuilhi said:nothing against the pups, as I haven't heard them yet
...but I just watched 8mins of video, and no sound clips? at least compare them to 81s or something
bare knuckles have had covers. for a while. vintage looking ones.
Capulin Overdrive":3v0ak7zi said:madrigal77":3v0ak7zi said:Bare Knuckles aren't actives though.
could be active if you wanted. Duncan has a preamp made to work with passives! i've got the preamp, but haven't tried it yet.
Yeah, but that apparently makes them sound 90% Blackouts and 10% original pups. It would be a waste to get some expensive boutique pups like Bare Knuckles and then slap the Blackout Preamp on them.Capulin Overdrive":3fz660jz said:madrigal77":3fz660jz said:Bare Knuckles aren't actives though.7slinger":3fz660jz said:nothing against the pups, as I haven't heard them yet
...but I just watched 8mins of video, and no sound clips? at least compare them to 81s or something
bare knuckles have had covers. for a while. vintage looking ones.
could be active if you wanted. Duncan has a preamp made to work with passives! i've got the preamp, but haven't tried it yet.