
Random Hero
Active member
So I got a Fat Boost 3 yesterday and have been running it with my Cornford Harlequin all day. It sounds great but I dunno if I would be happier with the Full Drive 2? I used to have one when I had an XTC and it was just great, plus the extra boost side could be really quite useful. I guess in short, I'm looking for a little more of that TS-type compression/midrange rather than just a straight-up clean boost, which I originally thought I wanted. Make sense?
As I say, not knocking the pedal but I'm unsure it's exactly what I'm after.
At the minute, I'm finding because the Fat Boost 3 is just clean boosting, thus essentially just making my guitar output higher, I'm having to run the gain a little higher on the amp than I ideally want to in order to get the liquid sustain I want. To me, a cranked preamp with a boost infront just ends up sounding a bit messy and doesn't compress in a pleasant way, so I figure with the Fulldrive I'll be able to run the drive lower on the amp and boost it up with the FD - I guess dialling in actual gain - adding the onboard boost too should I need that little bit extra - essentially giving me a clean/crunch, drive and lead all in one.
Does that seem to make sense?
Your thoughts?
As I say, not knocking the pedal but I'm unsure it's exactly what I'm after.
At the minute, I'm finding because the Fat Boost 3 is just clean boosting, thus essentially just making my guitar output higher, I'm having to run the gain a little higher on the amp than I ideally want to in order to get the liquid sustain I want. To me, a cranked preamp with a boost infront just ends up sounding a bit messy and doesn't compress in a pleasant way, so I figure with the Fulldrive I'll be able to run the drive lower on the amp and boost it up with the FD - I guess dialling in actual gain - adding the onboard boost too should I need that little bit extra - essentially giving me a clean/crunch, drive and lead all in one.
Does that seem to make sense?
Your thoughts?