S
Skirmish
Active member
GuitarGuyLP":3kywtjfq said:Skirmish":3kywtjfq said:guitarslinger":3kywtjfq said:Skirmish":3kywtjfq said:I`m no expert when it comes to buying a house, but I`m an expert when it comes to finances and I would never ever go under 40% down. If you can`t do that: Move and keep renting until you have the dough. Remember subprime?![]()
with that rationale, wouldn't the buyer want to pay 100% cash?
![]()
Well, yeah. But that`s unrealistic so my advise is to keep it as safe as possible financially speaking. And everything under 40% is too high of a risk still imho unless you have a super safe job that guarantees you yearly salary raises etc... Usually the brokers will recommend a lower percentage because they want to make money.
So I second what Digital Jams said and from what I`ve read so far, the main reason for Juggernaut to look into houses are the annoying neighbours. He also said that his wife is not working full time yet, so unless they can afford a down payment of 40% I would suggest renting a house instead to stay more flexible as it still solves the original issue.
Good luck in any way though Juggernaut!
40% is not realistic for a lot of people, or just in a lot of markets. If I went by that rule I would have needed a $140,000 down payment for a starter home where I live. How many years would you have to save up for that. Buying real estate is an investment. As such it does have a risk to it. I think that the worst of the sub prime is over, and I would say that doing a proper budget where your house payments, utilities, and taxes are 50-60% of your monthly budget at the most is much more important then having a 40% down payment.
True, you got a point and I completely agree, especially with the proper budget part. But like you said, buying real estate is a big risk and I always cringe when I hear people talking about buying homes and taking that risk, when owning a home doesn`t rationally make their life that much better. This is something everybody should have learned from the crisis and a lot of people don`t need to own a home. If you have reasons like incoming kids and lack of space, or if you NEED to crank that 100 Watts to the max, a very high possibility of staying in that one spot for a long time etc... the benefits of owning a home are worth taking that risk imo. I don`t know if that`s the case here, but to me it seems unwise to buy just because you want to leave the neighbours behind. What if the new neighbours turn out to be just as bad after a while? What if the job makes you move across the country? Etc... There are a lot of likely scenarios where you need to get rid of the house quick (e.g. a lot of careers demand flexibility these days, and it`s going to be even more important in the future) and the possibilities of losing out are not slim.
I have first hand experience as my parents needed to sell their house because they got scammed by a broker, and they lost $400000 (fourhundredfreakingthousand) on it because they couldn`t find a buyer for three years. So, imho, really think before you buy and make a wise decision if the benefits are worth the risks.