J
NoHassle
Well-known member
It's ONLY his stepdaughter and not his biological daughter and she was 19yo AND this happened back in March 2025.
Sounds like a transaction gone wrong or a jealous mother who couldn't blow as well as her daughter.
How desperate are you to smear a Rep with TRIVIA.
NoHassle
Well-known member
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
Good. Lock him up and throw away the key if he's guilty.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
This story is from 2022
Findthetone1
Well-known member
Much like the OP, the internet runs a little slower in "New Zealand"
J
JDs Couch
Well-known member
Wrong fucker. The case happened when she was 19, but
Court documents indicate the victim underwent years of sexual abuse and surveillance. The crimes began in 2014 when the child was 12.
Once again, here you are defending a pedo. Interesting pattern.
J
JDs Couch
Well-known member
You are truly a sick fuck. I would NEVER accuse you of being a pedo, but let's say that you are the ONLY member who consistently defends and makes excuses for pedos.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Why not trot out Anthony Weiner. It’s at least as relevant as a 4 year old case of an ex candidate for S. Dakota house rep.
J
JDs Couch
Well-known member
And? That makes it ok¿?
Findthetone1
Well-known member
NoHassle
Well-known member
Pedo? She was 19 or did I miss something?
NoHassle
Well-known member
If it happened in 2014 and he was later charged when she was 19 that is a LOT of years of here say evidence because if it was solid in 2014 they would have arrested and charged him then.
Seems like a lot of years NOT to stop and charge him way back.
70 Mach 1
Well-known member
Thats an adult in all 50 states.
Not agreeing him banging her is right though.
They're both over the age of consent
Not agreeing him banging her is right though.
They're both over the age of consent
Last edited:
J
JDs Couch
Well-known member
Moron. Court documents indicate the victim underwent years of sexual abuse and surveillance. The crimes began in 2014 when the child was 12.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
No, it makes it irrelevant to anything that’s going on currently.
Findthetone1
Well-known member
Then by all means, hammer the fucker.
But thanks for the update, Matlock.
What's your next case?
Oh...and:
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
That is one cute fuckin kitten.
Findthetone1
Well-known member
Indeed
NoHassle
Well-known member
I want to memorialise this post so you can finally understand my views on these types of posts by you.
I do not in any shape or form support pedophilia or rape.
I do not support people being prosecuted for these crimes without irrefutable physical evidence and/or fully independent witnesses to the crime.
I do not support he said she said evidence to these crimes...ever. Nobody can be trusted based on their words alone.
Your only intent with these disgusting posts are to entrap people here so they trip up and you can hopefully have them smeared and banned.
Why do you continue to post about pedos and in particular only about Republicans and not Dems unless you're sole intent is to entrap most people here with your disgraceful bait.
There are rules that the Monkey has mentioned a few times and you walk a tight line, but in my opinion, you should be banned because your malignant intent in this context is far worse than actually calling someone here a pedo.
You want to smear people here with the worst kind of crime...again, you're dangerous to all on this forum and should be 100% gagged on this subject or banned.
@Monkey Man
