
VC4Ever
New member
What justifies that huge price gap? Wood must be the same I mean alder is alder. Ebony is ebony. Does it come down the the time spent on it. Do they play and sound that much better?
VC4Ever":3g7wgvwv said:What justifies that huge price gap? Wood must be the same I mean alder is alder. Ebony is ebony. Does it come down the the time spent on it. Do they play and sound that much better?
JerEvil":2g0cy0d5 said:An ESP will get you more of your initial investment back on resale. I have owned both and my ESP's were superior to their LTD counterparts. Not perception but fact. of course mine were older and I hear the build quality of the Standard series guitars has become hit or miss.
mightywarlock":2i0cpiu5 said:I think it has to do with the quality of the wood.
I've owned several ESP's and several LTD's.
There was always something different about the LTD's, but just slightly, and the hardware was less quality...kind of like the difference between Gibson and Epiphone.
Yes, wood is wood, but there seems to be different qualities of wood.
I've since sold off all my LTD's, but even ESP's are hit and miss.
I had an ESP Eclipse I didn't like the tone of, and an M-1 I didn't like either, but my main guitar right now IS an ESP M-1 (I've still got 2 of them, and a Viper).
They, like all guitars, are different...and each instrument has to be played to see/feel the differences to see if it will work for you.
I've played several LTDs for long enough to get the understanding of what they are. For a Korean "more affordable" pseudo ESP, they're alright. Things I noticed were fret ends being less polished and finished; inability to get action totally low and perfect without a little buzz here and there; nut wasn't as accurately cut; electronics - this is a given, they're cheaper; finish isn't as meticulous; woods are plied and layered as opposed to solid slabs or what not; fingerboard wood was lesser quality. All these things aside - for the price, they're fantastic guitars. And if one were so inclined, I bet you could get an LTD, spend some time on re-setting it up, some upgraded bits, and it would be ace. Furthermore, MANY of the signature models are finished with just a bit more zeal and care.Bob Savage":1mtpobxf said:But, I just bought my first ESP LTD and have no real experience comparing so again, assumptions but they're made based upon standard industry business practices.
killertone":1krkh2b6 said:LTDs are not all made in Korea though. They used to be early on but that changed. The Korean ones are generally much nicer than China or Indonesia although the Chinese ones are catching up quick.
Ventura":vcz9yyof said:Compared to the straight up ESP line, these guitars (the actual "ESP" models) are just "perfect" shredders out of the box. And ya, when you hold one and strum it - it feels sonically connected; and it's finished perfectly. It's obvious that aside from the hardware and cost of materials used, there's simply "more time spent" on these guitars during their manufacturing process from start to end.
satannica":2mx4c3ka said:I've had LTDs and have ESPs now. The equivalent ESPs are far far better than the LTDs. I didn't keep my EC1000s once I got my Eclipse.