Marshall TSL100 FX loop tone...

[sixstringking713]

I have a Marshall TSL100 and I noticed the "B" FX loop connections (dedicated for only the crunch/lead channels when only this Send/Return is plugged in) sounds far better than plugging the FX loop into the "A" or general FX loop of the amp when playing on the crunch/lead channels. So I have been using this "B" FX loop, but then if I switch to the clean channel, I essentially dont have an FX loop connected (Because when "B" is the only one used, it is only thrown the crunch/lead signal). Has anyone else noticed this with the TSL100? Kind of makes the amp a lot less useful. Thinking of buying a DSL100

 

[Mailman1971]

Not sure on your question....but watched some of your Youtube clips...
The Hot for Teacher Talent show....

Good stuff mang!!

 

[sixstringking713]

Not sure on your question....but watched some of your Youtube clips...
The Hot for Teacher Talent show....

Good stuff mang!!

Ha! Thanks, that was 4 years ago, I'm 20 now.

Let me try and re-phase my question..

Has anyone else noticed a difference in the tone between using LOOP A vs LOOP B on a TSL100?

 

[Mailman1971]

I did have a TSL 100 about a year ago. Cant remember what loop I used....but I do know there was some slight difference and I just chose the better sounding one.

 

[sixstringking713]

I did have a TSL 100 about a year ago. Cant remember what loop I used....but I do know there was some slight difference and I just chose the better sounding one.

yeah I use the better sounding one too, but then the clean channel is excluded from the FX loop in that configuration..

I love my TSL100 but I really hate how complicated they made the F%)(* FX loop. Should have just made it serial, and go to all the channels.