Mesa Mark IIC+ Clip Comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter gibson5413
  • Start date Start date
gibson5413

gibson5413

Well-known member
Hey guys, I need your ears. I recorded a cover of You Could Be Mine over the weekend. All the rhythm and leads guitars were recorded with a clean boost. I wasn't particularly happy with the tone. I thought squished and compressed the rhythm guitars. I re-recorded the clip this morning without a boost on any of the guitars. Which do you prefer?

The clip without a boost sounds more open. The rhythm breathes better. What do you guys think?

:wave:

Clip without boost



Clip with boost
 
I'd say the unboosted sounds better.

As sick as your amp usually sounds (you make great clips!) this is another example where Mesa's don't do classic Marshall type crunch very well IMO. That is why one of each is needed for copping total tonal ground ;)
 
i agree,


sounds great, but it dont sound like a marshall.


oh yes,


i prefer the unboosted too!
 
It will never sound like a Marshall. I will just have to get a Fortin! :thumbsup:

I do like how the Mark sounds doing anything. Just that kind of guy!
 
I like the unboosted version better, especially the lead. I think the rhythm is simply too smooth, there's just not enough grind, maybe the other guys are right about that being a Marshall thing. I mean, it sounds really good, just not mean.
 
I like the unboosted better, the boosted is too compressed for me. I agree with the others that the mark IIC+ just doesn't sound like a marshall. One of the big reasons I have a mark IVA and a Marshaall 2553. Nice playing, BTW :rock:
 
Mudder":3bv1efdn said:
I like the unboosted version better, especially the lead. I think the rhythm is simply too smooth, there's just not enough grind, maybe the other guys are right about that being a Marshall thing. I mean, it sounds really good, just not mean.


Yeah, a Mesa Mark series will never truly sound like a Marshall (and vice versa). The Mesa is designed after a modded Fender. It's all good.
 
Yeah, I like the one without the boost better too!




......actually, they both suck....because you're giving me IIC+ GAS for leads again. Bastard.

:D
 
blackba":2lefg0xe said:
I like the unboosted better, the boosted is too compressed for me. I agree with the others that the mark IIC+ just doesn't sound like a marshall. One of the big reasons I have a mark IVA and a Marshaall 2553. Nice playing, BTW :rock:


Thanks! One of these days I would love to own a Fortin modded Marshall someday.
 
VH4_BigRig":2l0pf24u said:
Yeah, I like the one without the boost better too!




......actually, they both suck....because you're giving me IIC+ GAS for leads again. Bastard.

:D


Thanks! I'm not sure what I like better. I like both for different reasons. It's all good!
 
Back
Top