cyndicate":356lcfyu said:
sebby123":356lcfyu said:
232cap":356lcfyu said:
Any love for the mark 5? I demoed one at my local mesa dealer and at first I thought it was really nice but is seemed like the honeymoon phase wore off in the store. I almost bought it but got cold feet with it. I wonder if I missed something. Seems to be a lot for sale on the used market. The crunch channel seemed way to dark no matter where I had it set. I was running it thru a mesa 4-12 v-30 cab. Opinions?
Get a mark IV, III or IIC+ and you will be way happier
Yep. I had a V for about 5-6 weeks, recently unloaded it and sold it for the price I bought it new, however I only lost out on paypal fees

But I picked up a IVA at a decent price to replace it and pocketed the difference. I wouldn't look back on getting rid of the V, if you are looking for full out Versatility the V probably wins, but in terms of tone the IV and IIC+ probably do a better job, the lead channel on the IV IMO is better than the V in every aspect. I really want to see how a IIC+ sounds but it's hard coming across one with a EQ that doesn't cost a fortune.
The IIC+/IV mode on the V felt very boxy/nasally/overly compressed sounding to me, I could never get it close to where I have the IV. I got the IV in this morning and was able to dial in my old settings and get the tone I wanted that the V couldn't deliver in just a matter of minutes. I know the V wasn't meant to nail the IV / IIC+ modes 100% but they could have done a better job on it, I tried very had to like the V but I'm glad I unloaded it before I would have lost more money on it. A ton of others have been unloading the V as well. So IMO if you have a IV or IIC+ already you aren't missing anything and hold on to it
I would probably pass on the V until they do another revision and hopefully fix the lead channels, all the other channels were great though