
Mailman1971
Moderator
Whats the difference besides one having more power?
Options and tone are they about the same?
Any help is appreciated.
Options and tone are they about the same?
Any help is appreciated.

glip22":2i1g03je said:It was only a matter of time.
I would go for the Triple, but I never played the double. It may not stack up to your FJA though. I think you would like the Twin Jet. You can find them for 1700.00, maybe a little more. A Rec has got to be around a grand plus.Mailman1971":3pyj6d04 said:glip22":3pyj6d04 said:It was only a matter of time.![]()
![]()
But are they both voiced the same???
Power section only the difference?
I have a chance to get either amp for about the same price....
dont hear much talk about the Triple recto .....
always Dual recto...![]()
Tawlks":2i2yv5e0 said:It's just more cash you're gonna be spending on valves, that is, if they sound the same.
Shiny_Surface":36tgcwnb said:Tawlks":36tgcwnb said:It's just more cash you're gonna be spending on valves, that is, if they sound the same.
Triples sound a little tighter/more aggressive, even at lower house volumes imo.
Rec's need as much clean power as possible for the way their preamp is voiced, the more the better when it comes to that particular preamp design, even if you don't play stadiums.
Especially if you play lower tunings...
One of the worst sounds imo is when a Rectifier's transformers saturate and the tone starts to fall apart. Not good imo.![]()
![]()
Mailman1971":1qnovkp3 said:Wasnt sure what else was changed besides the power section.
Well the more power to push the pre-amps with less 'struggle' seems the way to go.Shiny_Surface":8zlodfz6 said:Mailman1971":8zlodfz6 said:Yeah I had a Single recto for a while....sounded great at medium volumes.
Crank it....well....![]()
Was going after a Dual recto when I saw a Triple pop up for about the same price.
Wasnt sure what else was changed besides the power section.
It's true that it's just two power tubes added and nothing else, but it still sounds slightly different (to me) even at lower volumes, I can't explain it.![]()
![]()
glassjaw7":8zlodfz6 said:Modded Rectos rule!![]()
Mailman1971":19eifvvf said:Well the more power to push the pre-amps with less 'struggle' seems the way to go.Shiny_Surface":19eifvvf said:Mailman1971":19eifvvf said:Yeah I had a Single recto for a while....sounded great at medium volumes.
Crank it....well....![]()
Was going after a Dual recto when I saw a Triple pop up for about the same price.
Wasnt sure what else was changed besides the power section.
It's true that it's just two power tubes added and nothing else, but it still sounds slightly different (to me) even at lower volumes, I can't explain it.![]()
![]()
![]()
Just wasnt sure if major changes were made to it.
Not too much talk about these amps though.
Mailman1971":19eifvvf said:
Thanks again for the Info....Gsxrbusa":2steg66a said:Hey bro, I have had them both at the same time......er, uh, wait where was I going with that?![]()
Anyway. The triple is more scooped and tighter by a hair. The dual is more open and less scooped. The dual definitely cuts better in a mix. I prefer the dual. Also, re tubing it is cheaper.
Shiny_Surface":2steg66a said:If you're getting it modded it might not matter as much and "close the gap" between the two, just a hunch.![]()
![]()
So it seems the vote (at least metal wise) has been for the Triple.roadifier":1zzvjg3k said:A triple rectifier with an 808 as a boost is great for tight metal! The main difference is just power, but the triple is tighter, more "open" and sounds bigger than the dual
Tawlks":1rxb2dxr said:It's just more cash you're gonna be spending on valves, that is, if they sound the same.