Not many know this, but a GH100TI / GH100S is just the first 3 stages to a JCM800 with an added 4th gain stage and cathode follower like the hot mod’s everyone’s adding to their 2203s. They were doing it ages ago. The amps are seriously underrated.
someone posted this on another forum when i asked what was difference was between my S and the regular ones, seems helpful
So here is a real quick rundown of the differences between the GH100L and TI models. They are surprisingly different. I've marked the schematics with a few numbers to make things easier to explain, but first the more general stuff:
The first big difference is that the topologies are basically two different amps! The Hi/Low inputs on the L just adds a pad, where as the Low input on the TI bypasses the first stage and then the amp is similar to the JCM800 Hi input 3 stages + CF.
Next the L has a switchable boost stage (inserted AFTER the 1st stage!) and the TI doesn't. This also means it has two gain controls (gain and drive) whereas the TI only has one
The shaping of the clipping/bias is different. Both amps start with a classic JCM800 2k7//680n followed by:
L - 2k7//680n > 10k> 820R. center-cold > cold > warm
TI - 10k > 820R > 2k7. cold > warm > center-cold
Notably here the TI doesn't add any tone shaping/boosts with bypass caps. The L has another 680n which is the classic Marshall upper mid bite. Alternating between cold>warm>cold tends to enhance asymmetric clipping due to each stages output being inverted with the respect to the input.
1) TI has much more bass (22n coupling cap) compared to L (4n7+4n7 in series ~ 2n2) for a girthier tone
2) TI has bright caps and L doesn't. This I guess compensates for the lack of additional cathode bypass cap boosting.
3) 2n2 can be added in series with the 22n coupling cap to cut bass/tighten.
Additionally the TI has a bright cap on the 2nd to 3rd stage attenuation network to boost some upper mids.
The 3rd to 4th stage attenuation network pushes approx double the signal to the 4th stage than the one in the L, so that stage will clip harder.
There is way more nuance that what I've put here. In many ways the L is numerically gainier than the TI but the TI's clipping is more aggressive, thus sounds like it has more gain.