
blackba
Well-known member
I saw this post over on TGP. https://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... 37&page=27
Here it is in case the link doesn't work. Do you guys agree, any thoughts?
Here it is in case the link doesn't work. Do you guys agree, any thoughts?
440gtx6pak":1jadhh90 said:I bought a MK-IV when it first came out (circa 1992) and hated it, but kept it because I just knew it was a good amp and the problem was my own limitations. It literally took me over a year to be comfortable with it enough to use 'live'. Yes, I do know how ridiculous that is and why some find it easier to just hate it and move on. But it made me able to deal with anything out there. I guess that is what learning is about. I also own the MK-V, which is much more straight forward in how things are set up, but does not quite nail the magic that is a dialed-in MK IV.
3 things that ended my MK-IV aggravation:
> the 3 mini-masters mess with your tone when not on 10. Use instead the Global Master to tame the volume.
> tone controls, "mids" on 10 ..bass on "0" .. treble set per particular guitar (since they are all before preamp distortion this avoids 'bass-flub').
> add bass only with the EQ and bypass when live to cut through ... and avoid the infamous "V" EQ shape.