Pam Bondi laying groundwork for hatespeech laws in the US

  • Thread starter Thread starter harddriver
  • Start date Start date
To me Bondi has not done what she was put in place to do.

So many opportunities to have people pay for what they've done over the last 5+ years. So much irrefutable evidence and so many witnesses ready to testify and Bondi's hit rate is zero.

This DOJ is no better than the previous and in fact worse as she has so much evidence. A missed opportunity for actual justice to be executed to prove to us citizens that the law does in fact get upheld no matter who you are. Of course we all know that's a complete lie and always has been.
 
1st-Amend_full-scaled.jpg


There is no such thing. Congress makes Laws not Pam.
It takes 2/3thrds majority in Congress to ratify the US Constitution and seeing how they cant even pass a budget or fund the Gov't not going to happen.
another dRump crack-pipe fantasy.
 


Benjamin Netanyahu is the scum of the universe. That guy will record men in the bathroom. He will point a camera at your asshole or use a microphone to record you on the thunderbox as Boris Johnson put it.

Sick fuck isn't doing it all alone either. He has people to help him do it. Can you imagine some guy for the Israeli Defense Force or Mossad has to deal with this shit? Guy just wants to defend his country and pay his bills and now he's forced to stare at assholes all day taking a shit because of bisexual Bibi. Most fucked up politician I've seen lately.

Justice for Boris Johnson!


boris.jpg
 
Anyone here ever accuse another man of recording him in the bathroom and then it's all smiles and handshakes after?

WTF!?!?!?
boris-bibi.jpg
 
1st-Amend_full-scaled.jpg


There is no such thing. Congress makes Laws not Pam.
It takes 2/3thrds majority in Congress to ratify the US Constitution and seeing how they cant even pass a budget or fund the Gov't not going to happen.
another dRump crack-pipe fantasy.
Dan's actually right on this. Any stupid law stopping people from criticizing Israel or Palestine, or whatever, would be shot down quickly by the Supreme Court.
 
Candace has changed for the worse.
I don't really follow Candace but she had the shortest video to illustrate Ms. Bondi's statements which would seem to qualify as violating the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution within the United States of America. Free Speech usually means freedom of speech that one doesn't agree especially political speech or speech critical of government/governments action or actions. The founding fathers were very specific about how the constitution was worded. Pre-crime or thought crimes have been thoroughly warned about by a multitude of dystopian authors and futurists and this faux left right paradigm appears to be being used to flaunt the constitution.

Violent threats or threats that lead to violence or criminal acts under civil/criminal law penalties exist within the current legal frameworks already debated/litigated and then passed by Congress. The slippery slope is who is defining what hatespeech is and what it is not which seems to become amorphous and ambiguous by the entities trying to enact such policies regardless of political affiliation and once began never ends well for the populace.

For example currently the people of the United Kingdom and EU have hatespeech laws how's that working out for them?

A Dream for some................A Nightmare for others..............:dunno:
 
Dan's actually right on this. Any stupid law stopping people from criticizing Israel or Palestine, or whatever, would be shot down quickly by the Supreme Court.
OR would it? You can burn the American flag or any other flag all day long........is there a flag you cannot burn in the USA?

 
The Constitution is a moving mythical target, I say this as people quote it, ignore it, lean on it, denounce it and so on.

The Supreme court many times over certainly doesn't administer what it calls impartial justice aligned with the Constitution.

Whenever I hear it spoken about I simply laugh to myself as some jackass is once again exploiting it in some way or another to suit their needs.

As they say, it ain't worth the paper it's printed on in the modern world.
 
The Constitution is a moving mythical target, I say this as people quote it, ignore it, lean on it, denounce it and so on.

The Supreme court many times over certainly doesn't administer what it calls impartial justice aligned with the Constitution.

Whenever I hear it spoken about I simply laugh to myself as some jackass is once again exploiting it in some way or another to suit their needs.

As they say, it ain't worth the paper it's printed on in the modern world.
Many Constitutional Experts have stated the USA has been Post Constitutional for many years possibly decades now and the Supreme Courts and Congressional actions seems to back this up.
 
Many Constitutional Experts have stated the USA has been Post Constitutional for many years possibly decades now and the Supreme Courts and Congressional actions seems to back this up.
The only thing w/ Congress not doing its job is the GOP because they hold the majority.
They have been AWOL except to starve kids, take the poorest American taxpayers heathcare and give it to Billionaires.
 
Back
Top