PRS Custom 24 "Wood Library" on MF

  • Thread starter Thread starter iplayloudly
  • Start date Start date
That looks bizarre. I'd quite like to own it though.

I really like PRS guitars. I've always wanted one. I just can't commit the asking price for one. PRS are the guitar equivalent of Apple. If you charge high enough for something, people begin to believe it's actually worth that much.
 
Now I'm a huge PRS fan, and have been since I played one the first time in 1993. Have owned a bunch and have four keepers that I've hung onto. I love them, they just work for me, and I've only bought one new.

But that thing is just ridiculous looking, I can't even imagine why they let that one out.
 
JimmyBlind":66pva30x said:
That looks bizarre. I'd quite like to own it though.

I really like PRS guitars. I've always wanted one. I just can't commit the asking price for one. PRS are the guitar equivalent of Apple. If you charge high enough for something, people begin to believe it's actually worth that much.

Some of their guitars aren't too bad, compared to other high-end makers. I have a CU22 that I bought used for $1400. It is hands down the best guitar I have ever played. I also used to have a CE24 I got for $1000. Another great guitar for the price.
 
Just the term "Wood Library" makes me lol, maybe they have a better classification for their very best tops now "Congressional Wood Library".
 
jcj":8v9nfdw4 said:
danyeo":8v9nfdw4 said:
You would think Gibson put that together. :lol: :LOL:


My first thought, when I clicked. :lol: :LOL:


LO fucking LOLOL. When is Gibson just gonna hang it the fuck up? I use to have a LP and it was nice. I wish I didn't get rid of it. I tried a few at GC a while ago and was like WTF?

As for that PRS? $4300 ? HEH!!!!
 
If I had ordered that guitar, and it showed up with that top....I would send it back.
 
Wow! I got mine two weeks ago. Top as it should be with the exception of some lighter variation on the horn.
 
Some of those at that link are nice. 14209954 is NOT.. (and that's the one that comes up from your link)

14210092 is quite nice
 
This has been happening to PRS in recent years. A '10 top' is definitely not what it used to be. I have seen some absolutely horribly matched/figured tops being marked as '10', so it has become very clear that their standard has shifted. I understand that their production numbers/desire in market has gone up significantly in recent years, and they likely had to start doing this to still make their quantity demands/profits, but it does make me scratch my head a bit, especially with their prices consistently creeping up every year.

I'm a huge PRS fan, and own a bunch of them, but seen this happening has kept me from EVER ordering a PRS sight unseen. The used market has way too many good ones for SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper with actual 10 tops, if not absolutely fantastic Artist grade tops.

I think we see stuff like this happen to builders all the time. They likely paid a premium for this top, because it showed potential when it was still a raw piece of maple. However, when they matched/carved/stained it, something definitely went south in the process. It's always bit of a guessing game when you work a raw piece of maple, and this one did not go in their favor. Back in the day, PRS either would have scrapped the guitar, or just sold it cheaper as a 'non-10-top'. However, they're clearly driven for profit now, and have enough backing in their name for dealers to take the instruments anyway, even if it's a small hit to them in perception of quality.

At the end of the day, PRS still makes their money, and GC/MF will eventually be blowing this guitar out, like they were with their huge unsold stock of PRS guitars not too long ago. Circle of life for a guitar like this :lol: :LOL:
 
You know what's puzzling is that PRS has just countless guitars out there with really perfect tops, and even non 10 tops that are just sick. But someone must have been smokin some good shit when they matched that top. I bet it plays and sounds great but NOBODY is shelling over 4K for that. I think they'd sell it for 2K easy.

Tops like these warrant a high price tag, not that one.

2013_prs_paul_reed_smith_paul_s_guitar_copper_electric_guitar_1319096-10.jpg


FiguredMaple.prsFlame.jpg


DSC_1078.jpg


img_3367.jpg
 
danyeo":3hp6t66e said:
You know what's puzzling is that PRS has just countless guitars out there with really perfect tops, and even non 10 tops that are just sick. But someone must have been smokin some good shit when they matched that top. I bet it plays and sounds great but NOBODY is shelling over 4K for that. I think they'd sell it for 2K easy.

Tops like these warrant a high price tag, not that one.

2013_prs_paul_reed_smith_paul_s_guitar_copper_electric_guitar_1319096-10.jpg


FiguredMaple.prsFlame.jpg


DSC_1078.jpg


img_3367.jpg

Those are some great looking tops! The first is not bookmatched, it's a 1 piece top. It's kind of a crap shoot 'cause the wood is graded before it's carved, making it somewhat guesswork.
 
Back
Top