Review, Pics and Vids of the STEAVENS Poundcake 100 MkIII

  • Thread starter Thread starter hunter
  • Start date Start date
hunter

hunter

Active member
As there is not much information in the web or press about STEAVENS amps, I invested a bit of time to give it a proper covering and share my views with you guys. I hope you appreciate it. Please bear in mind that the videos will only give a rough idea of the tones that can be had, I would have loved to do some proper ones at higher volume, in a good studio and with quality video gear ... still the vids as they are will be a good information source.

pc100_8.jpg


Overview
Manufacturer: STEAVENS
Model: Poundcake 100 MkIII
Tubes: 4xEL34 or 4x6L6, 6x12AX7
Features:
-4 channels (Clean/Crunch/Meat/Heat)
-2EQs for drive and Clean
-3 Boosts (Gain/Mid/Bright) alternatively or in combination usable
-FX loop serial or parallel, with mixing and (master) level control, swtchable
-2 master volumes for drive, separate Clean master
-7button foot switch for direct access to channel, boost, master and effect loop, or in PGM mode: 12 Programs
-Midi out for control of external effects
-Presence and Depth controls in the master section
-Switch for 6L6 or EL34
-RRP: 2,890€
-Made in Germany by http://www.steavens.com

Preface:
The Steavens Poundcake has been around in different variations since the early 90s, and the Amp has a very loyal fan base. Even if the commercial break-through (so far) is still missing, Steavens has world-wide reputation for the quality of the product and their great sound. Here we have the youngest incarnation of the Poundcake evolution - in its version MkIII with 100W and 4 channels.

I received the Steavens 1 week ago. In this time I had enough opportunity to test it at two rehearsals and three gigs (a Cover/Top40 band and a Metal band). The Amp was run both with the factory JJ12AX7 and JJ6L6GC, as well as with a Quad RFT EL34 - and for the sound examples/videos it was finally equipped with 4xSED=C= EL34, a GT12AX7M in V1, TungSol 12AX7 in V2-V5 and a Chinese G9 12AX7 in the phase driver.

The Amp more than convinced within this short time and proved to be a real allround talent, more about this below.

Basic concept:
The Amp is designed to be at the center of your rig, providing all the tone and switching - a midi capable external FX device in the loop and you can well be set. 99 Midi Programs can be stored with settings for channel, master, combinations of the existing boosts and the switching status of the FX loop. The front panel seems a bit weird at first sight, since all 4 gain pots are placed on the far right of the amp, the EQs for drive and clean on the left, between them the two masters for the drive channels and the clean master. However one can already tweak without thinking after a few minutes of getting used to it. It feels like EQs and gains, once adapted to your guitar and sound preference, can be left alone and I found myself doing most of the changes to switches and boosts rather than the other settings.

The absence of an overall master volume is not such a major issue, since with the loop engaged, the loop level can work as a master. However, in a live situation and in order to adjust the volume balance with and without loop engaged, you'll have to set levels for Master1, Master2, CleanVolume and FX Level, which can take some precious minutes of your sound check time.

The amp's workmanship is on a high standard, cleanly developed with generously dimensioned transformers and high-quality parts, as well as a clean internal structure on PCB. The ceramic power tube sockets are mounted on PCB, which might disturb some. Nevertheless the whole thing looks very rugged and IMO there's no reason to doubt the durability and road-worthiness of the Steavens.

The looks of the Amp is a matter of taste. The tolex doesn't remind me of the smoothest of leathers, but it is finished properly and clean. The case is quite high and not very deep, somehow the proportions are weird, inside there is a lot of space above the transformers/power tubes - so the head could have been smaller - at the cost of air flow. However it's quite nice to be able to install a Bias Rite without taking the amp out of it's head shell.

Function as well as sound of the loop are outstanding - as well with rack effects as with pedals.

Tone
The Poundcake is not a soft contender. It is a mean and beasty amp that pumps a lot of air and packs a punch. You gotta be careful with the bass and depth controls as well as with the master, if you don't wanna kill those famous small animals in the close surroundings with the first power chord. However, the beast can be tamed if you use the master volume in the loop to bring it down to TV levels if that is what you're up to. The basic character of the Amps is rather dry and transparent, i.e. on the modern side of the spectrum. It feels rather like a JCM800 on steroids than a hotrodded JTM45, tight and punchy! However, with the various channels and their different basic characters as well as the three Boosts there is an extreme sound pallet at your disposal. The Steavens has its own character- its highgain may be somewhere between Marshall and Diezel, but it retains a certain creaminess in the mids, which sounds expensive, without being mushy or diffuse. Transparency and dynamics of this amp are really absolute top class. Gain wise, the four channels overlap quite generously, thus everyone should be able to find a preferred balance of rhythm and lead tones. If that is not sufficient yet, designer Bernhard Stephan offers to adapt the Amp to subjective preference of the buyer once and free of charge.

The Boosts
The Boosts are all three very different animals. Boost 1 (Gain Boost) pushes the gain stage and adds also a good portion of bass content. I like this boost more in combination with the Mid and/or Bright Boost. The Mid Boost acts in the upper mids, and feels a bit like a down shifted bright switch. Mid Boost doesn't add loads of gain but seems to shift the mid focus more towards a Marshall flavour, as you can hear in the attached videos. The Bright Boost adds brilliance and a good portion of Gain. Somehow it's similar to turning up the bright channel on a Plexi, the sound opens up and gets more agressive, and used with low gain settings it also makes louder quite a bit.

Channels and sounds:

The cleans in the Poundcake are not to be understood as necessary add-on. It sounds marvellous and gives the competitors in my amp collection (Triamp MkII and Bogner XTC 100B, as well as a Axe FX) a run for their money. This channel alone covers a huge array of tones. Hyper clean sounds for picking Marillion style, funk chords etc. are no issue as well as driven blues tones from Stevie Ray Vaughn up to Free are no problem. I do not exaggerate, if I say that I repeatedly switched on the Amp and remained just on this channel, because dynamics and transparency of the sound are so breathtaking - and I hate playing clean in general! With all three boosts on and the gain cranked you already get a lead sound, which would be sufficient for many.

>>>Video 1: Intro & Clean-Channel<<<



Crunch takes over where clean left, however initially it charms you with a softer, somewhat more compressed character while being more fundamentally British than channel 1. This is perfect if you like Marshalls but find them too harsh. However things change once you up the gain and make use of the boosts. With the Mid Boost you get right away a Marshall crunch of the most addictive kind, amazing cut and punch with loads of body, tone and character. If that is not enough you can crank the gain further and let the walls shake with any combination of the three Boosts to go from early Fleetwood Mac to Iron Maiden and already cover pretty much everything, that was derived from marshal and their fellow followers from the 60s to the 80's. With the gain boost engaged and the gain cranked (on the Steavens that means to 25) you can also obtain a beautiful, creamy lead sound à la Santana, that is already so fat and has so much meat, you have to ask how much the "Meat" Channel can still put on top of this.

>>>Video 2: Crunch-Channel<<<


The Meat and Heat channels have similar gain reserves, with Heat giving perhaps 20% more "felt gain". The main difference of the two channels is in the voicing, as Meat is a tad more open and dry, with somewhat more focus in the upper in the mids, while on Heat the center frequency shifts somewhat downward, moving more air on single notes. Heat is also less "tight" in the lower frequency than Meat. Both channels can go from Scorpions, via Metallica to Killswitch:Engage kinds of gain, and with use of gain, EQ and boosts you have infinite sound variations at your disposal. Meat can also pull off some serious metal, especially if the amp is opened up a bit and you add mid and bright boost to give you crunch and cut even at extreme gain settings. With all three Boosts engagde in the Heat channel there is some serious, blistering gain happening, and surely Steve Vai would enjoy this sound as much as Mikael Åkerfeldt of Opeth. At 2/3 gain in the Heat channel there is an imprint on the front panel that says "go nuts!", and this is by all means not an empty promise! The sustain is endless and the individual notes drip over to their harmonics with ease, while always retaining a transparent and dynamic basic character. Only with deafening volumes the response gets softer and more spongy - similar to an SLO100, which also must be cranked to smoothen out. Bedroom wankers should should look out for a good attenuator unless they like the rougher feel of the tones at low volume. Without exaggerating I gotta say that Mr. Stephan (Steavens) has created a true master piece here!

>>>Video 3: Meat-Channel<<<


>>>Video 4: Heat-Channel<<<


>>>Video 5: Meat & Heat Channel (alternative take)<<<


Result:
With 4 channels, 3 Boosts and 2 Masters the combinations of possible sounds with the Poundcake are endless already without even touching any tone controls. The very effective EQ and the dynamic reaction of the amp towards different guitars, cables, tubes and cabs make sure, the Steavens deserves a place right at the top of the hit list of the most versatile monster amps. It masters all disciplines with quality, finesse and character, and has no weaknesses! One might assume that on such a high gain amp perhaps there'll be an average clean channel or a lack of character in the crunch tones, but this is not the case. It's one of very few multi channel amps that have the balance right to get amazing tones in all disciplines. It masters recording duties, the Top40 gig, as well as the metal band each with mouthwatering tones. Verdict: A true master piece with addictive tones, absolutely professional performance and a refreshing own tonal character that plays in the major league of multi channel amps!

PROs
+Sound
+Dynamics
+Transparency
+Punch and volume
+Versatility
+Sound shaping with 3 different boosts
+Effects loop (sound & function)
+Midi and provided foot switch

CONs
-No overall master volume (except with use of the loop)
-Midicontroller (other than the foot switch provided) only usable via adaptor cable
-Looks could be more luxurious (though this is subjective)

Gut Shots

mk3_1.jpg
mk3_2.jpg
mk3_3.jpg
 
Awesome.
I wouldn't be surprised if Steavens would use your review and the vids for further advertising - at least he should think about it.

:thumbsup:
 
duesentrieb":1wi5yrj9 said:
Awesome.
I wouldn't be surprised if Steavens would use your review and the vids for further advertising - at least he should think about it.

:thumbsup:

Thanks Düse ;)

I guess he deserves a bit more coverage, so indeed I wouldn't mind if he did.

German amps rule, which is why I have a Bernhard, a Reinhold and a Hans/Lothar. I wouldn't mind another Peter in my collection either, I'm missing my Einie :rock:
 
duesentrieb":23nbbvwt said:
hunter":23nbbvwt said:
I guess he deserves a bit more coverage
Absolutely.

Yep, and Bernd is a real "nice guy" :)

Talked to him at the Frankfurt fair and asked him when his Rack stuff
comes back. No decision 'bout this made yet.
 

Attachments

  • steavens_radioactivator(3).JPG
    steavens_radioactivator(3).JPG
    147.1 KB · Views: 1,216
  • steavens_radioactivator(4).JPG
    steavens_radioactivator(4).JPG
    124.4 KB · Views: 1,143
Top review.
You've got a mighty arsenal of multi channel monsters.
Seems like a comparison would complete the picture.
 
Awesome! Thanks for that review, one of the best reviews I have seen on here. I wonder if there are any Poundcakes in the states. :rock:
 
cyndicate":gifn3ujs said:
Awesome! Thanks for that review, one of the best reviews I have seen on here. I wonder if there are any Poundcakes in the states. :rock:

Squarehead has my old Poundcake 100 MkII. I know of one other person that has one.

I only sold mine because Bern was going to hook me up with the MK3 version. He's the busiest guy I know so I haven't been breaking his balls about it ;)

CJ, great review man :rock: I'll be speaking with Bern next week. I'll make sure to point him to this thread and try to convince him to join RT :thumbsup:

Have a great weekend everyone!
Mike
 
Big Kudo's to the effort and presentation. That amp sounds phenomenal on the clean and crunchy stuff. Of course it's ungodly expensive isn't it. Does he make a 1 or 2 channel amp that's crunch/heavy and clean depending on gain/boost settings?
 
FortinAmps":3e6l2w7i said:
cyndicate":3e6l2w7i said:
Awesome! Thanks for that review, one of the best reviews I have seen on here. I wonder if there are any Poundcakes in the states. :rock:

Squarehead has my old Poundcake 100 MkII. I know of one other person that has one.

I only sold mine because Bern was going to hook me up with the MK3 version. He's the busiest guy I know so I haven't been breaking his balls about it ;)

CJ, great review man :rock: I'll be speaking with Bern next week. I'll make sure to point him to this thread and try to convince him to join RT :thumbsup:

Have a great weekend everyone!
Mike

Thanks a lot Mike. Your tip with the Tung Sols and the =C=s was spot on. Only thing I did was replace V1 with a Penta GT12AX7M, makes it a bit fatter while retaining the crispness of the Tung Sols.

Had Bernhard on the phone today for about 30 minutes, he'll make me a Midi Adapter cable for free. :thumbsup: He also told me that he's working on some interesting stuff, for his next generation of amps.

He's a great guy, if only he had more time to hang out here, but he's a too busy man...

Ah he told me the amp takes 6550s too, guess I'll have to try a quad of those definitely :rock: :rock:
 
duesentrieb":7kf5k1xs said:
Awesome.
I wouldn't be surprised if Steavens would use your review and the vids for further advertising - at least he should think about it.

:thumbsup:

Absolutely agree about using it for ad! After reading it I called to Bernhard about my mod for Brick, PC50 etc.

Your review is very good and very informative, but I was kinda surprised about absence of any comparison with Bogner XTC. Feature-wise Poundcake is very similar, but could you write some about difference in tone/gain/feel etc. Thanks :thumbsup:
 
picassochild":8yvz8i02 said:
duesentrieb":8yvz8i02 said:
Awesome.
I wouldn't be surprised if Steavens would use your review and the vids for further advertising - at least he should think about it.

:thumbsup:

Absolutely agree about using it for ad! After reading it I called to Bernhard about my mod for Brick, PC50 etc.

Your review is very good and very informative, but I was kinda surprised about absence of any comparison with Bogner XTC. Feature-wise Poundcake is very similar, but could you write some about difference in tone/gain/feel etc. Thanks :thumbsup:

Hey, what kinda mods are you gettin on the PC50?

So the question regarding XTC vs PC is kinda tough to answer. Bear in mind that my comparison is with a 100B model Bogner.

Both, the Steavens and the Bogner have addictive tones in spades. In the clean department, as well as crunch sounds, the Steavens wins by a good length. The Bogner's clean channel is just that, whereas the Steavens has cleans to SRV type tones with ease, and it has more depth here, too. The crunch in the steavens has more body than the XTC's blue channel and it's easier to play than Plexy mode. However red channel on XTC with low gain gives also a very addictive crunch, which is a bit more elastic than on the Steavens.

Regarding high gain, I would say that it's easier for the Steavens to pull off modern styles and nu metal riffing, whereas the XTC has the more crazy lead sound, more bright and more dirt - while the Steavens retains a certain luxurious and refined note in this department.

I would say that there is something insane/crazy about the XTC's (100B) lead tone that is unmatched by any other amp I've tried.

Usability wise, the Steavens wins again, as the loop on the Bogner is noisy and the switching pops at times.

Also the Steavens has virtually no noise even at the highest gain settings, which is quite a miracle to me.

So to summarise: If your focus is on THAT lead tone, the XTC still wins. If it's about versatility and usability as well as modern high gain rhythm sounds, the Steavens wins.
 
.... by the way, I've made some more recordings in the meantime, for those interested:


Brothers in Arms on Crunch Channel:


The Loner on Meat Channel:


The Loner on Heat Channel:
 
Wow! That amp sounds awesome! Very versatile and I like how the boosts seem to dramatically change the sound of each channel. Great review to...thanks! :thumbsup:
 
hunter":1ki3izzl said:
Hey, what kinda mods are you gettin on the PC50?

Bernhard told that changed clean channel on MKIII and did some tweaks for other channels too. So, basicly it's mod to MKIII specs.
 
picassochild":uorzta9v said:
hunter":uorzta9v said:
Hey, what kinda mods are you gettin on the PC50?

Bernhard told that changed clean channel on MKIII and did some tweaks for other channels too. So, basicly it's mod to MKIII specs.

Yeah man that Clean channel is really something else. I love it so much, it really feels like a completely different amp, still blends over great when you switch to the drive side. It is full but not dull, and it has nice attack and great, blooming sustain. With the boosts switched in it's also a great lead sound à la Shine On You Crazy Diamond, addictive is all I can say (and I'm really not that much into cleans usually).
 
Meanwhile I had experimented a lot with tubes, even threw in a Mullard NOS in V1, RFT power tubes, =C=EL34s and such, and I found it great at home, but playing out with the band it wasn't that great. Was listening back to my first clips and so I thought I'll give it a try with the JJs again. This weekend I put the stock JJs 12AX7s and 6L6GC in again and at last night's rehearsal the tone was just smashing.

I guess this amp is designed around JJs, they're cheap and reliable and it does sound great with these tubes, just needs to be dialed in right! I need to listen more with my ears rather than thinking expensive must always be better. :doh:
 
Back
Top