D
DLJR
Member
Who's the winner?
glpg80":ev57ukdk said:The SLO is definitely an amplifier that would require an attenuator to be useable.
cardinal":1uij3klc said:I think Bill's rack SLO use to be mine. Never played a Bones, but I thought that SLO sounded awesome from bedroom volumes all the way up to vaporizing-small-aminals volume. I've bought and sold a fair share of expensive amps the last few years, and that SLO is the only one that I miss. Really shouldn't have sold it; don't really know why I did.
glpg80":3815lqks said:I've played both recently. Had the change to play Bill's rack SLO at above band volumes and ampjunkie's fortin bones.
The bones definitely had more compression under the notes but the gain was very mildly voiced in the sense that it was not pissed off sounding but rather very rounded and even. It was fun to solo with and easy to play but did I not much care for the rhythm tone - YMMV.
ampjunkie":1lolp7ex said:We never messed with the EQ. (The last time I played it, before the get together, I was using the low gain setting, so I had changed up the EQ to suit that). The bright switch was off too. I'm not even sure if the boost was on either..... Believe me, it can get much more aggressive.
jmgman69":26q1a2cn said:I am a bones fan![]()