
amiller":2lp33neq said:Looks great!![]()
I can't wait to read your reviews.![]()
nbarts":3ifn7h5k said:Why didn't you just buy an orville then?
nbarts":bcm8pniy said:Neither the body or the headstock on Edwards look anything like Gibson.
nbarts":3nwnh6i0 said:Headstock on Edwards is night & day different from Gibsons as well as every aspect of the finish.
Orville is the only make I know of that I would call Gibson replica.
nbarts":l7cxvxs8 said:Here is my beloved Edwards JS. If it looks like Gibson to you, then you are not familiar with Gibson LPs.
![]()
Vrad":2fiyhgcm said:nbarts":2fiyhgcm said:Headstock on Edwards is night & day different from Gibsons as well as every aspect of the finish.
Orville is the only make I know of that I would call Gibson replica.
ok... I guess I'm blind... I don't see much difference between the 2 guitars in this thread...
ratter":3ksi7r5b said:Vrad":3ksi7r5b said:nbarts":3ksi7r5b said:Headstock on Edwards is night & day different from Gibsons as well as every aspect of the finish.
Orville is the only make I know of that I would call Gibson replica.
ok... I guess I'm blind... I don't see much difference between the 2 guitars in this thread...
+1...
I'd paint her blackVrad":1mi8c9i2 said:I'm going to turn it from this:
![]()
to this:
See attachment.
nbarts":3fjw6rlh said:Here is my beloved Edwards JS. If it looks like Gibson to you, then you are not familiar with Gibson LPs.
![]()
duesentrieb":2nr95be3 said:I'd paint her blackVrad":2nr95be3 said:I'm going to turn it from this:
![]()
to this:
See attachment.![]()
![]()
Congrats Vladimir !
nbarts":2p599qyn said:Well, I guess you are not as critical to craftsmanship as I am. I can see a world of differences just in pics. In person there are 2 completely different guitars to me.
But if it looks the same to you, it's all that matters.