blackba
Well-known member
In a debate on TGP forum about speaker break in. Some are claim it is a myth. I posted the following. Thought you guys might find it interesting.
PA, studio Monitors, and Hi-Fi Home speakers all do break in. On Page 155 of Vance Dickason's 'Loud Speaker Design Cookbook (Sixth Edition)' it talks about this. Please note the 7th edition is out. http://www.mfr-eng.com/ldc.htm
My Dickason says this at the start: "Prior to testing , all cone speakers should be broken in." Basically you don't want a speaker changing as you are validating the design, so manufacturers will test the speakers broken in to make sure their box design is good (Talking about PA and HiFi speakers here). He describes a 'loosening' of the speaker suspension system in the first five to ten hours of play. Here is the data from a peerless 6.5inch driver new and after 12 hours of break in with a since wave generator at 25Hz. All this info is out of Mr. Dickason's book referenced above.
Table 8.1
Before break in
F0: 49.9Hz
Qms: 2.11
Qes: 0.44
Qts: 0.37
Vas: 16.8 ltr
After break in
F0: 44.5Hz
Qms: 1.97
Qes: 0.39
Qts: 0.33
Vas: 21.6 ltr
They have a really nice graph in the book showing the frequency response difference. F0 is the peak low frequency, notice how it has shifte slightly lower, this is the more bass people may or may not be hearing.
Qms is the driver mechanical Q
Qes is the driver electrical Q
Qts is the drier total Q
Vas is the volume of air equal to the driver compliance
Mr. Dickason's book is a standard in the speaker designing industry. He does not manufacture speakers, so he has nothing to gain by 'inventing' speaker break in.
I have heard speaker break in myself both with guitar speakers and home stereo speakers. Its nice to see some of the science behind it in Vance Dickason's book.
https://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... 668&page=3
PA, studio Monitors, and Hi-Fi Home speakers all do break in. On Page 155 of Vance Dickason's 'Loud Speaker Design Cookbook (Sixth Edition)' it talks about this. Please note the 7th edition is out. http://www.mfr-eng.com/ldc.htm
My Dickason says this at the start: "Prior to testing , all cone speakers should be broken in." Basically you don't want a speaker changing as you are validating the design, so manufacturers will test the speakers broken in to make sure their box design is good (Talking about PA and HiFi speakers here). He describes a 'loosening' of the speaker suspension system in the first five to ten hours of play. Here is the data from a peerless 6.5inch driver new and after 12 hours of break in with a since wave generator at 25Hz. All this info is out of Mr. Dickason's book referenced above.
Table 8.1
Before break in
F0: 49.9Hz
Qms: 2.11
Qes: 0.44
Qts: 0.37
Vas: 16.8 ltr
After break in
F0: 44.5Hz
Qms: 1.97
Qes: 0.39
Qts: 0.33
Vas: 21.6 ltr
They have a really nice graph in the book showing the frequency response difference. F0 is the peak low frequency, notice how it has shifte slightly lower, this is the more bass people may or may not be hearing.
Qms is the driver mechanical Q
Qes is the driver electrical Q
Qts is the drier total Q
Vas is the volume of air equal to the driver compliance
Mr. Dickason's book is a standard in the speaker designing industry. He does not manufacture speakers, so he has nothing to gain by 'inventing' speaker break in.
I have heard speaker break in myself both with guitar speakers and home stereo speakers. Its nice to see some of the science behind it in Vance Dickason's book.
https://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... 668&page=3
too funny wade!