Random Hero
Active member
Which is better?
danyeo":1pgjnbhc said:Neither. When you get to guitars in this quality range i think it comes down mostly to personal preference. Some guys hate Ibanez necks so anything that resembles a wizard neck is going to be hated.
Ivan, Robotechnology, has a J-Custom and i thought it was an excellent guitar, pretty much flawless. Of course Suhr's are top notch.
Some people just have to be diffficult...mrp5150":2e0kv206 said:Anderson
mrp5150":1lag3ew3 said:Anderson
mrp5150":3rmpncre said:Anderson
danyeo":1s3uw4vr said:Neither. When you get to guitars in this quality range i think it comes down mostly to personal preference. Some guys hate Ibanez necks so anything that resembles a wizard neck is going to be hated.
Ivan, Robotechnology, has a J-Custom and i thought it was an excellent guitar, pretty much flawless. Of course Suhr's are top notch.
Jakem":rp9xbq5k said:danyeo":rp9xbq5k said:Neither. When you get to guitars in this quality range i think it comes down mostly to personal preference. Some guys hate Ibanez necks so anything that resembles a wizard neck is going to be hated.
Ivan, Robotechnology, has a J-Custom and i thought it was an excellent guitar, pretty much flawless. Of course Suhr's are top notch.
Exactly. I've seen/tested few J-Customs and they've all been flawless when it comes to finishing. Fretwork, inlays, wooden binding on the neck etc. have been immensely well done. Action has varied from super low to higher so I dunno how even the fretwork was on the higher action ones but the frets looked damn well done. I don't like super low action guitars because I pick quite heavily when playing rhythm and I hate buzz which is caused by too low action so that didn't bother me.
Woods on the other hand might look good but sound like shit but I think I've heard that Suhr inspects their wood for sound qualities before choosing which neck to put on which body. Daniel, was it you or Steve who had a Suhr which sounded very bad?
-Jaakko
danyeo":2e0gw718 said:The Suhr that Steve had was chambered and imo it had an open mellow tone.
Jakem":28z3hz4r said:danyeo":28z3hz4r said:Neither. When you get to guitars in this quality range i think it comes down mostly to personal preference. Some guys hate Ibanez necks so anything that resembles a wizard neck is going to be hated.
Ivan, Robotechnology, has a J-Custom and i thought it was an excellent guitar, pretty much flawless. Of course Suhr's are top notch.
Exactly. I've seen/tested few J-Customs and they've all been flawless when it comes to finishing. Fretwork, inlays, wooden binding on the neck etc. have been immensely well done. Action has varied from super low to higher so I dunno how even the fretwork was on the higher action ones but the frets looked damn well done. I don't like super low action guitars because I pick quite heavily when playing rhythm and I hate buzz which is caused by too low action so that didn't bother me.
Woods on the other hand might look good but sound like shit but I think I've heard that Suhr inspects their wood for sound qualities before choosing which neck to put on which body. Daniel, was it you or Steve who had a Suhr which sounded very bad?
-Jaakko
Digital Jams":1qujm1wc said:That is the big problem, no matter the flame, quilt, origin of the wood, etc is going to promise an outstanding guitar and nothing will change my mind. Labels have nothing to do with the end result and even the best builders in the world can save a dead piece of tone wood. I was so close to ordering a CS Jackson with a Charvel type neck but I backed off because I did not want to chance getting a dull sounding guitar for that type of coin.
Here is JC fretwork though, pretty damn nice.
![]()
Juggernaut":2y8f9j1b said:Gutierrez![]()