Sunlight And Clouds Drive the Earth's Climate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bad Brain
  • Start date Start date
acceptance said:
Not sure if you read yet but the study authors call this into question:

“CO2 is an invisible trace gas that does not interfere with sunlight. It’s believed to trap thermal radiation coming from the surface, but that’s a misconception because the absorption of longwave radiation by CO2 and heat-trapping are completely different physical processes. According to the 2nd law of thermodynamics, heat-trapping is impossible in an open system such as the atmosphere,” Nikolov said.
Click to expand...

I think it’s fine he calls it into question, but as it stands it’s still just a question.
 
Laputan Machine said:
Temps rose as fast as the past 40 years around 1890-late 1930s. Then there was a reduction in global temps from then until the late 1970s. Now temps are (supposedly) rising again.
Industrial output/man made CO2 was of course way worse 1890s-1930s than the next dacades which saw huge increase in CO2 output, but those temps went down.

There's also the problem that measuring devices have changed radically over the past 50 years. And a lot of these sciencetards will compare data sets that were done with mercury thermometers 100 years ago to current satellite IR data. And if the old data set doesn't fit their narrative, they will just say 'oh, that reading was probably bad, so we need to do some science shit on it (IE noodly bullshit subjective math) to make it fit our narrative...of course when it does fit the narrative, then that data is all good. Or they will make up datasets from the past using subjective noodly math in order to compare. So many assumptions in these equations that they are as good as useless, it's here that they can inject whatever narrative they want (in the assumptive parts).

You have ice cores, which are used for this 'temps are rising faster than ever' bullshit, but the difference in temp differentiation is so small, that there is no way to accurately plot that to within a tenth of a degree as they claim using ice core samples.
Click to expand...
If you look at one sample, sure. But when you compare tons of samples you are able to get more exact numbers
 
Gotta love the term "Climate Change".

Of course there is climate change, it changes every fucking day.

Here is the answer to all your climate issues, LARGE FIERY BALL IN THE CENTER OF THE GALAXY.

End of story.
 
Geo said:
Gotta love the term "Climate Change".

Of course there is climate change, it changes every fucking day.

Here is the answer to all your climate issues, LARGE FIERY BALL IN THE CENTER OF THE GALAXY.

End of story.
Click to expand...

Huh?
 
Geo said:
Ok, i will splain for you since you are burnt.

Galactic, or Space Weather controls what atmospherically happens on earth.

But the powers at be won't tell you that because, there is no amount of money or control that will change it.

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena
Click to expand...

That’s one piece sure, but I don’t think the center of our galaxy is determining our climate.
Did you mean the sun? The center of our solar system?
 
But to add to that, I still haven’t read the whole thing but didn’t he use the moon as an analog of “earth without atmosphere”? I mean just that right there shows what an atmosphere does. You see it all over the solar system.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top