
Jakem
Well-known member
Me and couple of my pals went and held somekind of a mini-ampfest. We had Mesa Mark III & IV, Dual Recto and Triaxis and ran them thru an angled Mesa Recto Standard 4x12 cab. Here's some thoughts about these amps:
Mark IV (EL34 & 6L6) - damn this amp sounds fantastic!!! What a friggin' wall of sound and the notes remained clear, huge, fat, tight and natural. Can't go wrong with this head.
Mark III (6L6) - I was very very surprised to see how much rawer this amp sounded than the IV after all the comments which say that the III is very very close to IV. I liked the IV tones more. The IV seems to be a bit more compressed, smoother, thicker and modern sounding. I have no idea which stripe version this III was.
Dual Rectified (3ch) - Didn't really put much of effort for this amp but it sounded nice for heavy rhythm stuff when boosting it with a tubescreamer.
Triaxis (V2.01) - I haven't yet put my 2:90 into the rack (
) so I left the 2:90 at home and we ran the Triaxis thru the IV's power section. I was surprised to see how close to the IV this thing sounded! It was cool to see how well the Dynamic Voice worked at loud volumes! I have set the DV to 1.0 on my rhythm patches for low volume playing because higher settings tend to sound shitty. When putting it up to 6-9 at loud vols it sounded very nice and close to the IV. Like I said, we didn't do side-by-side comparisons but when playing both amps after each other the TA was in the very same ballpark as the IV! Wondering how much did the IV's power section affect this? Although the 2:90 power section is basically Mark series amps' power section it might sound quite different. We discussed about taking my recto std 4x12 and 2:90 with me, next time we go there, to be able to do better comparisons between the IV and Triaxis paired with a 2:90!
Mark IV (EL34 & 6L6) - damn this amp sounds fantastic!!! What a friggin' wall of sound and the notes remained clear, huge, fat, tight and natural. Can't go wrong with this head.
Mark III (6L6) - I was very very surprised to see how much rawer this amp sounded than the IV after all the comments which say that the III is very very close to IV. I liked the IV tones more. The IV seems to be a bit more compressed, smoother, thicker and modern sounding. I have no idea which stripe version this III was.
Dual Rectified (3ch) - Didn't really put much of effort for this amp but it sounded nice for heavy rhythm stuff when boosting it with a tubescreamer.
Triaxis (V2.01) - I haven't yet put my 2:90 into the rack (
