Tried Some New Amps This Past Week...

  • Thread starter Thread starter gibson5413
  • Start date Start date
gibson5413

gibson5413

Well-known member
I had some free time this past week on a business trip and decided to hit a Guitar Center. Walked in and saw a couple of amps I have been wanting to try for a long time:

- Genz Benz El Diablo
- Diezel Herbert
- Splawn Quick Rod

I grabbed a Les Paul and put the three amps through a workout.

The Genz Benz El Diablo was first. I ran through each channel and thought it sounded pretty good. It didn't bowl me over by any means but it wasn't bad either. It sounded a bit stiff to me as well. I thought the gain tones were a bit buzzy to me. I must admit I didn't play this one very much. Definitely a darker sounding amp. Had a tough time connecting with it.

I moved to the Spalwn Quick Rod and had to get myself accustomed to the knobs and settings (gears and such). I don't believe this was a newer version with the updated clean (I couldn't tell if it had an effects loop but I couldn't look on the back very well). I spent about 45 mins on the QR and I must say that I was extremely impressed. In fact, I haven't had this much fun playing a new amp as I did with this one. It is a bright sounding amp with a ton of mids. I spent most of my time playing on OD 1 and 2 between the 2nd and 3rd gears. I absolutely loved the lead tones I was dialing in. I usually love delay on my lead tones but this amp sounded great a la carte. It sounded good at low volume but breathes fire when pushed. I tried playing a guitar that was down tuned as well and will say that it didn't handle it as well. Either way, I really enjoyed this amp!! I have never been too enamored with Marshall amps but this amp (hot rodded Marshall) was great.

Last was the Diezel Herbert. I have been wanting to play this one for a couple of years now and I was excited to give it a shot. The amp looks great and the build quality is spectacular. I plugged in and played for about 30 mins. I have to say that it sounded really good but it did not meet expectations. No flaming please since I am the first to admit that I did not give it enough time or play it in optimal conditions. I will say that channels 1 & 2 were really good. The clean was one of the best I've heard on a multi-channel high gainer. It definitely shimmered. Channel 2 was my favorite! Very crunchy and 3D like. I was a bit disappointed with channel 3. I thought it sounded a bit too compressed. I had a hard time connecting with it so I moved back to channel 2. The Mid Cut knob was a cool feature but found I liked it best with the mids dialed in. Again, by no means did I not like the amp. I guess I have heard so much about the amp that my expectations may have been a bit high. That immediately gave it a bit of a disadvantage on this day. Either way, the amp as a whole is a thumbs up.

The winner for me was the Splawn Quick Rod. I think that it is fitting with the style of playing I have really been in to lately. In fact, I liked it so much that I went back the next day and spent some more time on it.

I will definitely say that my next amp will either a Spalwn Quick Rod or a Cameron CCV-100. ;)
 
Hopefully, my Splawn will be here within a couple of weeks. I haven't had a "real" amp since I sold my VHT in the first week of August :aww:

The wait is killing me :doh:
 
gibson5413":a69f8 said:
I had some free time this past week on a business trip and decided to hit a Guitar Center. Walked in and saw a couple of amps I have been wanting to try for a long time:

- Genz Benz El Diablo
- Diezel Herbert
- Splawn Quick Rod

I grabbed a Les Paul and put the three amps through a workout.

The Genz Benz El Diablo was first. I ran through each channel and thought it sounded pretty good. It didn't bowl me over by any means but it wasn't bad either. It sounded a bit stiff to me as well. I thought the gain tones were a bit buzzy to me. I must admit I didn't play this one very much. Definitely a darker sounding amp. Had a tough time connecting with it.

I moved to the Spalwn Quick Rod and had to get myself accustomed to the knobs and settings (gears and such). I don't believe this was a newer version with the updated clean (I couldn't tell if it had an effects loop but I couldn't look on the back very well). I spent about 45 mins on the QR and I must say that I was extremely impressed. In fact, I haven't had this much fun playing a new amp as I did with this one. It is a bright sounding amp with a ton of mids. I spent most of my time playing on OD 1 and 2 between the 2nd and 3rd gears. I absolutely loved the lead tones I was dialing in. I usually love delay on my lead tones but this amp sounded great a la carte. It sounded good at low volume but breathes fire when pushed. I tried playing a guitar that was down tuned as well and will say that it didn't handle it as well. Either way, I really enjoyed this amp!! I have never been too enamored with Marshall amps but this amp (hot rodded Marshall) was great.

Last was the Diezel Herbert. I have been wanting to play this one for a couple of years now and I was excited to give it a shot. The amp looks great and the build quality is spectacular. I plugged in and played for about 30 mins. I have to say that it sounded really good but it did not meet expectations. No flaming please since I am the first to admit that I did not give it enough time or play it in optimal conditions. I will say that channels 1 & 2 were really good. The clean was one of the best I've heard on a multi-channel high gainer. It definitely shimmered. Channel 2 was my favorite! Very crunchy and 3D like. I was a bit disappointed with channel 3. I thought it sounded a bit too compressed. I had a hard time connecting with it so I moved back to channel 2. The Mid Cut knob was a cool feature but found I liked it best with the mids dialed in. Again, by no means did I not like the amp. I guess I have heard so much about the amp that my expectations may have been a bit high. That immediately gave it a bit of a disadvantage on this day. Either way, the amp as a whole is a thumbs up.

The winner for me was the Splawn Quick Rod. I think that it is fitting with the style of playing I have really been in to lately. In fact, I liked it so much that I went back the next day and spent some more time on it.

I will definitely say that my next amp will either a Spalwn Quick Rod or a Cameron CCV-100. ;)

Try not to sell your Mark IV and just add to the collection, IMO :thumbsup:
 
troublehead":d36ee said:
Hopefully, my Splawn will be here within a couple of weeks. I haven't had a "real" amp since I sold my VHT in the first week of August :aww:

The wait is killing me :doh:


You will like it Bryan! It was very impressive. I will have one someday. :yes:
 
Shiny_Surface":3760b said:
gibson5413":3760b said:
I had some free time this past week on a business trip and decided to hit a Guitar Center. Walked in and saw a couple of amps I have been wanting to try for a long time:

- Genz Benz El Diablo
- Diezel Herbert
- Splawn Quick Rod

I grabbed a Les Paul and put the three amps through a workout.

The Genz Benz El Diablo was first. I ran through each channel and thought it sounded pretty good. It didn't bowl me over by any means but it wasn't bad either. It sounded a bit stiff to me as well. I thought the gain tones were a bit buzzy to me. I must admit I didn't play this one very much. Definitely a darker sounding amp. Had a tough time connecting with it.

I moved to the Spalwn Quick Rod and had to get myself accustomed to the knobs and settings (gears and such). I don't believe this was a newer version with the updated clean (I couldn't tell if it had an effects loop but I couldn't look on the back very well). I spent about 45 mins on the QR and I must say that I was extremely impressed. In fact, I haven't had this much fun playing a new amp as I did with this one. It is a bright sounding amp with a ton of mids. I spent most of my time playing on OD 1 and 2 between the 2nd and 3rd gears. I absolutely loved the lead tones I was dialing in. I usually love delay on my lead tones but this amp sounded great a la carte. It sounded good at low volume but breathes fire when pushed. I tried playing a guitar that was down tuned as well and will say that it didn't handle it as well. Either way, I really enjoyed this amp!! I have never been too enamored with Marshall amps but this amp (hot rodded Marshall) was great.

Last was the Diezel Herbert. I have been wanting to play this one for a couple of years now and I was excited to give it a shot. The amp looks great and the build quality is spectacular. I plugged in and played for about 30 mins. I have to say that it sounded really good but it did not meet expectations. No flaming please since I am the first to admit that I did not give it enough time or play it in optimal conditions. I will say that channels 1 & 2 were really good. The clean was one of the best I've heard on a multi-channel high gainer. It definitely shimmered. Channel 2 was my favorite! Very crunchy and 3D like. I was a bit disappointed with channel 3. I thought it sounded a bit too compressed. I had a hard time connecting with it so I moved back to channel 2. The Mid Cut knob was a cool feature but found I liked it best with the mids dialed in. Again, by no means did I not like the amp. I guess I have heard so much about the amp that my expectations may have been a bit high. That immediately gave it a bit of a disadvantage on this day. Either way, the amp as a whole is a thumbs up.

The winner for me was the Splawn Quick Rod. I think that it is fitting with the style of playing I have really been in to lately. In fact, I liked it so much that I went back the next day and spent some more time on it.

I will definitely say that my next amp will either a Spalwn Quick Rod or a Cameron CCV-100. ;)

Try not to sell your Mark IV and just add to the collection, IMO :thumbsup:


Oh, the Mark IV is going no where. I will feed the addiction that's for sure! ;)
 
Back
Top