UN won't investigate Nordstream sabotage

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsm
  • Start date Start date
rsm said:
https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-nord-stream-4398a755a2de6c09846362a1038badd8
wonder why? truth too inconvenient? especially for the US, or else why would they be against investigation? :ROFLMAO:

nothing to see here. if you still believe Russia destroyed their own pipeline: :hys:

karma is piling up on the Western colonial imperial powers.
Click to expand...
It is US who are THE criminals of the world...............fact.................look at our true history............disgusting lying hypocrites. I'm ashamed.
 
Last edited:
once you start looking back into all the wars the US had involvement, the truth is amazing. dating back to the Spanish-American War and the War Between the States.

The one that many find most difficult is WW2. Not to condone Japan's actions, they killed more people in China alone than Germany did in total. I've seen estimates in the 10M range, or higher. Look into the US sanctions / oil embargo on Japan in the '30s; Japan's expansion in the Pacific was seen as a threat to the US positions there. US needed a reason to get American serfs to support a war against Japan. (same playbook being used for China today, using Taiwan as the "reason". the playbook works, why change it?)

https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP3.HTM#:~:text=Rummel,including Western prisoners of war.

Recall that ALL of the US carriers were not at Pearl Harbor the day of the attack. Carriers never traveled alone and they still don't; they travel in carrier strike groups, battle groups or other types of groups consisting of various types of ships and support vessels.

Don't stop believing.

Is the US still looking for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? US still has troops there, guess they're still looking. :ROFLMAO:
 
84superchamp said:
Commie basterd!
Click to expand...
images (1).jpg
 
rsm said:
once you start looking back into all the wars the US had involvement, the truth is amazing. dating back to the Spanish-American War and the War Between the States.

The one that many find most difficult is WW2. Not to condone Japan's actions, they killed more people in China alone than Germany did in total. I've seen estimates in the 10M range, or higher. Look into the US sanctions / oil embargo on Japan in the '30s; Japan's expansion in the Pacific was seen as a threat to the US positions there. US needed a reason to get American serfs to support a war against Japan.

https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP3.HTM#:~:text=Rummel,including Western prisoners of war.

Recall that ALL of the US carriers were not at Pearl Harbor the day of the attack. Carriers never traveled alone and they still don't; they travel in carrier strike groups, battle groups or other types of groups consisting of various types of ships and support vessels.

Don't stop believing.

Is the US still looking for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? US still has troops there, guess they're still looking. :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
There was a 30 day period when GW was ( unnecessarily) awaiting congressional approval for invading Iraq. I clearly remember during that time seeing on CNN a convoy of Iraqi military trucks crossing over into Syria. I wonder what was in those trucks.

That’s not saying I supported the war. Or at least the way it was conducted. I would have supported 40 days of strafing runs and total annihilation of their infrastructure and then just going home, but…….
 
Aynirar27 said:
why would the US bomb two unused pipelines?
Click to expand...
remember Germany voluntarily suspended use of Nordstream1, and never authorized the use of Nordstream 2 even though it was operational.

If Russia wanted to cut the gas supplies to Nordstreams 1 and 2, they could simply turn off the gas.

If Germany decided it wanted Russian gas again, for any reason, and Russia agreed, then the gas would flow.

Now, let's go back a few years, before Nordtream 2 was started or completed; notice the list of US ruling parasties, demoncrat and republiturd, who warned against Nordstream being bad for the world. you may want to ask them why they destroyed it? :yes:
 
rsm said:
remember Germany voluntarily suspended use of Nordstream1, and never authorized the use of Nordstream 2 even though it was operational.

If Russia wanted to cut the gas supplies to Nordstreams 1 and 2, they could simply turn off the gas.

If Germany decided it wanted Russian gas again, for any reason, and Russia agreed, then the gas would flow.

Now, let's go back a few years, before Nordtream 2 was started or completed; notice the list of US ruling parasties, demoncrat and republiturd, who warned against Nordstream being bad for the world. you may want to ask them why they destroyed it? :yes:
Click to expand...
The article made it sound like Russia cutoff the first pipeline and then Germany said not to bother with the 2nd
 
Aynirar27 said:
The article made it sound like Russia cutoff the first pipeline and then Germany said not to bother with the 2nd
Click to expand...
Yes, when they needed parts repaired they were sent to Siemens in Canada, and Canada refused to send them back because of sanctions, reducing the supply. Russia eventually cut off the supply; but Germany also reduced consumption; both due to sanctions.

Both Nordstreams were operational prior to the sabotage; Germany and Russia could have agreed at any time to resume using the pipelines, weakening the sanctions on Russia. Destroying the pipelines made this possibility impossible. Who gained the most by destroying Nordstreams? Both Germany and Russia invested billions in the projects.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Some People Aren't Brainwashed and Actually Get It
2
Replies
21
Views
613
84superchamp
84superchamp
Back
Top