
marvcus
Well-known member
?
Its GLORIOUSZachman":11hn3n09 said:
What a great idea!jerrydyer":axy4s3cl said:I always thought it would be cool to build a dual 100 in a marshall chassis. just the power sections. make it look like a 100 head.
novosibir":2j3zm2ga said:What a great idea!jerrydyer":2j3zm2ga said:I always thought it would be cool to build a dual 100 in a marshall chassis. just the power sections. make it look like a 100 head.
In the late 80's Peter Diezel has modded Marshall heads w/ 2*50W stereo power stage w/ 2 stacked laydown OT's.
Dirk Baldringer even has modded Marshall heads w/ 2*100W power stage and altogether 8 EL34's on the chassis.
IIRC the PT was of a Marshall Major and 2 100W OT's standing side by side. But the output tubes were standing verrrrry close together on the chassis.
Wolf Hoffmann of Accept has had one of these beasts at that time. What a monster!
Larry
novosibir":246nvst5 said:What's your prob, Jerry?
I've mentioned the two modded amps as kind of examples on the way to your idea.
There's none, who's built just a stereo power amp in a Marshall head cab yet and I really thought, that's a great idea!
Vol I, Pres I, Depth I, Vol II, Pres II, Depth II = 6 knobs. Looks like a Marshall, but is a stereo power amp - still a great idea IMO!
Larry
novosibir":36md9use said:No prob, Jerry - and yes, I really were being genuine with saying, that it's a great idea!
I can't expect, that you in the USA would know, what some moddeers did here in Germany in the late 80's.
And they didn't do these mods in large numbers. AFAIK Dirk Baldringer made the 2*100W head only once for Wolf Hoffmann. I also can't imagine, that Peter Diezel made the 2*50W head more than 3-5 times. Maybe it's also only an unicate?
Rock on!
Larry
skoora":em919v3r said:I don't know if you guys have bad history with Larry or not but I read nothing boasting, sarcastic or antagonistic in his reply so WTF. If there is bad blood, c'iest la vie I guess.
Larry, thanks for the interesting history.
Yup....I remember seeing pics of that Animal!!!novosibir":a2zwsanf said:Wolf Hoffmann of Accept has had one of these beasts at that time. What a monster!
Larry
skoora":1tpr8q4l said:I don't know if you guys have bad history with Larry or not but I read nothing boasting, sarcastic or antagonistic in his reply so WTF. If there is bad blood, c'iest la vie I guess.
Larry, thanks for the interesting history.
jerrydyer":vrlz56rr said:skoora":vrlz56rr said:I don't know if you guys have bad history with Larry or not but I read nothing boasting, sarcastic or antagonistic in his reply so WTF. If there is bad blood, c'iest la vie I guess.
Larry, thanks for the interesting history.
its just a cultural thing I beleive. we all have different ways of saying the same thing and on the internet you cant see the dude face to face. Sometimes the comment appears to be something its not. Anyways, problem solved. Im half German Hes gotta love .![]()
![]()
marvcus":30r2397g said:Thanks for the err....responses...![]()
After reading Suhr's reply to the Reinhold Bogner quote, I am intrigued as far as the preamps reacting better to amp heads vs. traditional power amps. I was aware of the Marshall EL34 100/100 (and 50/50) but figured they aren't the cats meow since nobody really talks about them.
I should have phrased my question better by asking if, theoretically, you were to take just the plexi power section, throw it in a chassis w/ the trannies, etc. and integrated that into a power amp, would it be more reactive, say, than the current traditionally known power amps?
Even though I own rack gear, I am a noob with lots of it. Much more familiar w/ heads & combos.