
rsm
Well-known member
was that the video of different woods used for acoustic guitars?@pipedream audio still refusing to acknowledge the Warmoth video lol
I guess it’s more fun to debate than concede
was that the video of different woods used for acoustic guitars?@pipedream audio still refusing to acknowledge the Warmoth video lol
I guess it’s more fun to debate than concede
Electrics. Page 1 in this thread. If anyone can’t hear THAT then they’re stone cold deafwas that the video of different woods used for acoustic guitars?
What exactly? Three times I have conceded that my end result guitar was not going to work for me so I swapped out ONLY the body and was extremely pleased with the results. Yeah I took a bath selling the rejected finished bodies but unfortunately some pieces of wood aren't good for guitar bodies. I've seen it multiple times and it is still the biggest drawback to rolling your own Fenders.There are more things than just the wood that can vary.
Yeah but did you use laser leveling and precision measurement devices and then evaluate everything with a science device? If not then your example is discardedWhat exactly? Three times I have conceded that my end result guitar was not going to work for me so I swapped out ONLY the body and was extremely pleased with the results. Yeah I took a bath selling the rejected finished bodies but unfortunately some pieces of wood aren't good for guitar bodies. I've seen it multiple times and it is still the biggest drawback to rolling your own Fenders.
Sometimes a different pickup can 'help' a tone dead piece of wood but those guitars end up being the least played on the wall.
A "science device" lol--I'm guessing you are being facetious? The bodies I use are cut with precision measurements and CNC machines...I'm not whittling them down in the back yard.Yeah but did you use laser leveling and precision measurement devices and then evaluate everything with a science device? If not then your example is discarded
The only wood that changes my tTone is the wood in my PantsIf all things are switched out.. pickups, pots, wiring, bridge, nut.. I’m no scientist but I would think variances in the electronics, magnets and density of metal would effect the tone more than what wood those things are screwed into, and the tests I’ve seen back that up
The only wood that changes my tTone is the wood in my Pants
gonna need a scientific study to see how that effects the magnetic pull on the strings and what it does for the tone.
To think tree rings don’t exist is bafflingPick up and strum a Martin D18 and a D28. If you can’t hear a difference you are lucky.
To think that different types of woods don’t affect electric guitar’s sounds….baffling.
I think guitarists have long ago "jumped the shark" on this discussion.
Back when I had Vox AC amps with Blues, and a few Rics, I also had a BC Rich Stealth and an Engl rack rig with V30s. Putting my Rics into the Engl or putting my Stealth into a Vox; the difference mostly due to the amps, cabs, speakers not the guitars.
Music goal, neck size, playability, pickups, hardtail/trem/floating trem, etc., have more influence on why I use certain guitars and signal chains than whatever wood is used in making the guitar, especially solid body electrics.
In the early '90s, I had original Steinberger L guitar and bass, composite, active EMGs; they were very neutral sounding, and could achieve many different guitar sounds based on the signal chain; I've had a Gittler Titanium for several years, no wood, it has volume, treble and bass controls which give me a wide range of tones.
I think plugging electric guitars directly into oscilloscope, audio analyzer, spectrum analyzer, etc. and comparing the data would provide more information on the actual differences. Then using the same amp and mic , and measuring tools, for each guitar would provide an audio comparison with the supporting data.
Any tone/timber differences between the guitars, including those made by the same company, same model, same day, etc., could still be due to many factors not just the wood...i.e., nothing definitive to isolate the wood of each guitar enough to measure its impact on tone/timbre
IMO.
still it's a fun discussion, and watch the ideologies argue.
I was pretty blown away by a demonstration at Roberto Venn where the instructor added a single, very thin, maybe a bit thicker than a chopstick, sized brace just by wedging it between the body top and the body back. It was a totally different guitar. He would put it in, take it out and invited us to play it in and out. Pretty nuts just what construction techniques can do to an acoustic guitar.I agree with you that other things in the signal chain are more important than body wood for overall tone.
I'm all for measurements and I will be one of the last people there dying on that hill in any argument. If I can't measure it then it doesn't exist. The video I posted that was acoustic had numerous different guitars tested at various parts of the body. He also documented what happened to those measurements as he went from a built guitar to a finished guitar. Just removing a little wood from the braces, sides or top changes things and the measurements are documented.
You have a point?To think tree rings don’t exist is baffling