
nbarts
New member
^^^
Hard to argue agaisnt any of those. Funny coincidence, I ve been listening to GM for the last 2 daysMarshall Freak":izda97vv said:Something Marshallish? SLO? DSL/TSL/JVM?
Im pretty sure that Gary's tone is a clean or broken up channel(whether it be MArshall Or SLO) and then he hits it with one of those MArshall JackHammer pedals, an older one. Kinda what satch did with his Marshalls and DS1's . I was lead to believe that its more box distortion than amp distortion and I never understood that with something like an SLO or a DSL which both have fair amounts of gain on tap... I could be completely wrong..Shark Diver":2wigjnnv said:Yeah, I would say SLO. At least I feel I am getting that with mine. Minus the I'm not as good as GM thing.
Gainzilla":1uehc3z5 said:Im pretty sure that Gary's tone is a clean or broken up channel(whether it be MArshall Or SLO) and then he hits it with one of those MArshall JackHammer pedals, an older one. Kinda what satch did with his Marshalls and DS1's . I was lead to believe that its more box distortion than amp distortion and I never understood that with something like an SLO or a DSL which both have fair amounts of gain on tap... I could be completely wrong..
Gainzilla":8s96x3ql said:Im pretty sure that Gary's tone is a clean or broken up channel(whether it be MArshall Or SLO) and then he hits it with one of those MArshall JackHammer pedals, an older one. Kinda what satch did with his Marshalls and DS1's . I was lead to believe that its more box distortion than amp distortion and I never understood that with something like an SLO or a DSL which both have fair amounts of gain on tap... I could be completely wrong..Shark Diver":8s96x3ql said:Yeah, I would say SLO. At least I feel I am getting that with mine. Minus the I'm not as good as GM thing.
jesserides2005":2pni8tci said:I just saw Gary Moore in the thread title & had to post this. Roy would be proud!![]()
Dan!!! Thanks Bro, I couldnt remember that Guvnor Pedal to save my life..MrDan666":2k4l3oav said:Gainzilla":2k4l3oav said:Im pretty sure that Gary's tone is a clean or broken up channel(whether it be MArshall Or SLO) and then he hits it with one of those MArshall JackHammer pedals, an older one. Kinda what satch did with his Marshalls and DS1's . I was lead to believe that its more box distortion than amp distortion and I never understood that with something like an SLO or a DSL which both have fair amounts of gain on tap... I could be completely wrong..
Hey Kage!
You're correct man, he does hit a cranked to oblivion/broken up crunchy amp with a pedal. He used to always use the original black Guvnor pedal![]()
I think he probably goes that route, because he tends to favour poweramp distortion rather than preamp distortion.. and he only uses the pedal to get the input cooking a little bit more and add some extra cut to whats already there.
Also he can use that same style setup with any Marshally sounding amp and get a fairly consistant tone each time because he's not really relying on the preamp section of the amp to do all the work![]()
jesserides2005":1stqos1t said:I just saw Gary Moore in the thread title & had to post this. Roy would be proud!![]()
nbarts":1b3r9r0o said:jesserides2005":1b3r9r0o said:I just saw Gary Moore in the thread title & had to post this. Roy would be proud!![]()
Yep, that rips!! I really like how the amp acts when he rolls down the volume. I little brighter than what I had in mind, but pretty much spot on.
So you are saying that's the SLO, ha? I'm screwed![]()
I think you could get VERY close with a Vintage Modern 2466 and some kind of tube screamer type pedal.nbarts":w9jzui32 said:jesserides2005":w9jzui32 said:I just saw Gary Moore in the thread title & had to post this. Roy would be proud!![]()
Yep, that rips!! I really like how the amp acts when he rolls down the volume. I little brighter than what I had in mind, but pretty much spot on.
So you are saying that's the SLO, ha? I'm screwed![]()