Hunter Biden Photos?

stanz

Banned
Member
* Hunter Biden photos just happen to get released two weeks before the election? I'm not defending the guy, I'm just curious as to the details.
* The "crack" pipe was obviously staged for the photo... Who staged it?
* When were the photos taken?
* Who took the photos?
* Why did Hunter load them to his laptop? If not, who did?
* Did Hunter Biden know they were there?
* Why would Hunter Biden neglect to back-up the SSD to Time Capsule (like everyone else does) ... wipe SSD ... then reload once repairs were complete?
* Was this a pre-planned Godfather-esque setup for political leverage later-on?
* Was Hunter Biden a willing participant? i.e. Hijinx
* Did the SSD actually belong to Hunter Biden?

You don't choose a least likely to win candidate in a race that you want to win. If you want to lose, sure... Joe Biden is a logical choice. Tulsi Gabbard would have been a much stronger contender than Joe Biden, yet she was pushed-out of the running. Even with her alleged history, Hillary had a better chance than Joe Biden. What about my car mechanic, Ron? He has a better chance against Trump than Joe Biden.

Something stinks here, and it ain't the smell of Krull banging fecal matter out of WGAF's poop-hole.
 
Interview with John Issac, the man who claims to have discovered the photos. Serious implications for Joe Biden's campaign, or much ado about nothing?


 
By the time you get near the end of part 2, Mr. Issac turns into a conspiracy nut-ball. :no:
 
Russian shit, simple as that.

Hunter Biden dropping off a laptop of his for repair to some unknown partially blind guy who has no notes, no signature of the person who dropped it off etc etc?

Such a setup and like the Russian collusion shit, nothing will come of it. it is all a game that the crazy liberals pushed to a level never seen before
 
Sitedrifter":jiqu7722 said:
Russian shit, simple as that.

Hunter Biden dropping off a laptop of his for repair to some unknown partially blind guy who has no notes, no signature of the person who dropped it off etc etc?

Such a setup and like the Russian collusion shit, nothing will come of it. it is all a game that the crazy liberals pushed to a level never seen before
Sketchy, for sure. Did Mr. Issac say that someone "dropped it off" but never returned to pick it up? Okey-doke! :LOL: :LOL:
 
stanz":3rmtn4b4 said:
Interview with John Issac, the man who claims to have discovered the photos. Serious implications for Joe Biden's campaign, or much ado about nothing?


Promising subliminal demolition engineers in the form of JENGA :yes:

18c3551f85396950cfbe0068e41cb0e2.gif
 
The real issue of course is the authentication of the email/s.

They're in the hands of the FBI. The timing of certification could be critical to the election outcome IMHO.
 
Apparently, yes. The originals were given to the FBI; the press got PDF copies. :gethim:

There's one where a Russian dude's thanking Hunter for setting up a meeting with his dad. :LOL: :LOL:

EDIT:
Just to clarify. After looking at it again it would seem that the FBI has the 'puters (there were 3 laptops IIRC) and is searching for the originals and metadata. If they find such emails and choose to announce the fact without-hesitation, then it could well affect the election outcome IMHO.

As things stand, the press has only the PDF's containing screenshots of the alleged emails.
 
Monkey Man":3vi1p0uu said:
Apparently, yes. The originals were given to the FBI; the press got PDF copies. :gethim:

There's one where a Russian dude's thanking Hunter for setting up a meeting with his dad. :LOL: :LOL:

EDIT:
Just to clarify. After looking at it again it would seem that the FBI has the 'puters (there were 3 laptops IIRC) and is searching for the originals and metadata. If they find such emails and choose to announce the fact without-hesitation, then it could well affect the election outcome IMHO.

As things stand, the press has only the PDF's containing screenshots of the alleged emails.
Christ! Just imagine how many .gov folks are likely involved in shady shit. What about the .gov woman who had a chinese driver/butler who was under some sort of investigation. Didn't a .gov member once attend a unapproved meeting with some head of state in Iran? This nation is headed to hell on auto-pilot.
 
I'd say they're all doing it the world over. Human nature.

The Christians have a quote (from the Bible?) which goes something like:
"Any organisation / institution which isn't unceasingly-preoccupied with the word of God is doomed to corruption / failure".

Even if one doesn't subscribe to the religion, one can see the principal involved - that man, if left to his own devices, is predisposed to corruption, especially where money and / or power are concerned. Of course the Bible warns about this too - "... the love of money is the root of all evil", or something like that.

Peeps more often than not corrupt the saying to say "Money is...", but in fact it specifically states that "... the love of money...", which when you think about it, makes sense. Like guns, money itself isn't a bad thing; it's how it's used and viewed that leads to such practices.
 
Monkey Man":21jzu8el said:
Apparently, yes. The originals were given to the FBI; the press got PDF copies. :gethim:

There's one where a Russian dude's thanking Hunter for setting up a meeting with his dad. :LOL: :LOL:

EDIT:
Just to clarify. After looking at it again it would seem that the FBI has the 'puters (there were 3 laptops IIRC) and is searching for the originals and metadata. If they find such emails and choose to announce the fact without-hesitation, then it could well affect the election outcome IMHO.

As things stand, the press has only the PDF's containing screenshots of the alleged emails.

Now if the Press just had an anonymous source on this matter they could print it as fact. :yes:
 
Monkey Man":1t2mmdu7 said:
I'd say they're all doing it the world over. Human nature.

The Christians have a quote (from the Bible?) which goes something like:
"Any organisation / institution which isn't unceasingly-preoccupied with the word of God is doomed to corruption / failure".

Even if one doesn't subscribe to the religion, one can see the principal involved - that man, if left to his own devices, is predisposed to corruption, especially where money and / or power are concerned. Of course the Bible warns about this too - "... the love of money is the root of all evil", or something like that.
On the other hand, could Homo sapiens be the result of genetic hybridization? Idigenous subject (e.g. Neanderthal) + unknown subject = Homo Sapien? Except for Homo sapiens, all living things on this planet are equipped to survive their respective environment. Without intellect, I do not believe Homo sapiens could survive this planet. Is it possible that those responsible have been watching our progress since they first began the experiment? e.g. Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. Is it possible that relatives of the indigenous subjects continue to exist today?
 
Lots to unpack there, brother; not sure if I'm game, but hey, without digging too deep (get it?)...

Neanderthal is a "myth". Every piece of evidence I've seen suggests that they were just people who lived in caves in the Neander Valley (IIRC what it was called). As humans age, our brow bones grow forward / larger. These days folks don't really live long-enough for it to become obvious, but if you lived, say, 3 or 400 years, you'd look like a Neanderthal, no doubt.

The fact that they were stooped over is more-logically explained, in my mind, by the very-old-age thing and the fact that they had severe osteoporosis than morphing from an ape into man (biophysically impossible, but that's another can o' worms).

Old people with big brains, stooped over. Nothing to see here.

IOW, I believe that a fairy tale and "mythical creature" have been invented when good-old common sense could've 'splained things quite-nicely. It wouldn't be the first or last time...

When you say, "Without intellect, I do not believe Homo sapiens could survive this planet", I have to agree with you 100%; we wouldn't have a hope in Hell!

Reason? Not designed for life sans intellect. The tools animals are equipped with leave our petty strength, speed, tolerance for heat and cold, eyesight including night vision, sense of smell and so on for dead. We'd be as lost as libtards at a GOP convention, or commies at a libertarian camp. :LOL: :LOL:
 
Krull":1va7kcgb said:
stanz":1va7kcgb said:
Monkey Man":1va7kcgb said:
I'd say they're all doing it the world over. Human nature.

The Christians have a quote (from the Bible?) which goes something like:
"Any organisation / institution which isn't unceasingly-preoccupied with the word of God is doomed to corruption / failure".

Even if one doesn't subscribe to the religion, one can see the principal involved - that man, if left to his own devices, is predisposed to corruption, especially where money and / or power are concerned. Of course the Bible warns about this too - "... the love of money is the root of all evil", or something like that.
On the other hand, could Homo sapiens be the result of genetic hybridization? Idigenous subject (e.g. Neanderthal) + unknown subject = Homo Sapien? Except for Homo sapiens, all living things on this planet are equipped to survive their respective environment. Without intellect, I do not believe Homo sapiens could survive this planet. Is it possible that those responsible have been watching our progress since they first began the experiment? e.g. Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. Is it possible that relatives of the indigenous subjects continue to exist today?
This is all Goat right here ^.

Good morning Goat. :LOL: :LOL:
Notice how EVERY Democrat Libtard is a 100% trolling hypocritical liar & nothing will EVER change that. They're a cancer in a 'normal' society.
 
Monkey Man":962e46or said:
Lots to unpack there, brother; not sure if I'm game, but hey, without digging too deep (get it?)...

Neanderthal is a "myth". Every piece of evidence I've seen suggests that they were just people who lived in caves in the Neander Valley (IIRC what it was called). As humans age, our brow bones grow forward / larger. These days folks don't really live long-enough for it to become obvious, but if you lived, say, 3 or 400 years, you'd look like a Neanderthal, no doubt.

The fact that they were stooped over is more-logically explained, in my mind, by the very-old-age thing and the fact that they had severe osteoporosis than morphing from an ape into man (biophysically impossible, but that's another can o' worms).

Old people with big brains, stooped over. Nothing to see here.

IOW, I believe that a fairy tale and "mythical creature" have been invented when good-old common sense could've 'splained things quite-nicely. It wouldn't be the first or last time...

When you say, "Without intellect, I do not believe Homo sapiens could survive this planet", I have to agree with you 100%; we wouldn't have a hope in Hell!

Reason? Not designed for life sans intellect. The tools animals are equipped with leave our petty strength, speed, tolerance for heat and cold, eyesight including night vision, sense of smell and so on for dead. We'd be as lost as libtards at a GOP convention, or commies at a libertarian camp. :LOL: :LOL:
Awesome reply, but I must disagree on Neanderthal. If not Neanderthal, a relative. Forensic evidence (in the form of fossilized footprints) indicates an in-line gait. Homo sapiens do not walk this way, yet the fossilized prints are a near match that of modern human. Like many plaster casts of alleged "Sasquatch" prints, the fossilized Neanderthal (relative) prints also include the (tree-climbing) midtarsal break which Homo sapiens do not possess. I actually had a much longer version. One that pointed-out our lack of natural strength compared to other animals; which you mentioned in your reply.

If you have time, check-out this Lloyd Pye clip. I don't agree with his planet collision theory, but I think he was on the right track regarding the origin of Homo sapiens. I reject the theory (yes, theory) that human life "evolved" via metamorphesis. As far as mammals are concerned, physical change is possible through interbreeding only. i.e. Creation via hybridization. It is my contention that Homo sapiens are the result of interbreeding (and/or genetic experimantation) with alternative DNA.

Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness, to rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it." 27 So God created man in His own image...

 
This shit goes so deep in our govt and other govt`s that its more like the grand canyon than a rabbit hole.
 
Back
Top