Trump Impeachment

lester":1i001e0v said:
BREAKING: Alex Vindman and His Twin Brother Escorted Off White House Grounds Friday Afternoon, Dismissed From NSC Jobs

:salute: ...that's Lieutenant Colonel Vindman.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/0 ... man-111997

"An Army spokesperson told NBC News, "We can confirm that (both Lt. Cols. Vindman have been reassigned (or severely apprenticed :)) [sic] to the Department of the Army, out of respect for their privacy, we will not be providing any further information at this time."
 
there's a video of nadler speaking outside on the street and some dude in the background is yelling "you a loser! your all a bunch of losers!!!" not sure if it's real or not but it's funny as fuck. it's twitter or instagram or something.
 
JackBootedThug":1tf75n4y said:
there's a video of nadler speaking outside on the street and some dude in the background is yelling "you a loser! your all a bunch of losers!!!" not sure if it's real or not but it's funny as fuck. it's twitter or instagram or something.
If the stumpy lint sucking midget fat nad was smart he'd turncoat like Romney effectively did and do a transfer of motion over to where the real power is. Could you image that on fake news? :) BTW, on a side note. My wife works at Ashley furniture stores (for the fat-ass' Wanek's) and she's instructed to use this motion phrase sales pitch as if there's some sort of fricking scientific shit going on here. They expect my WIFE to act as if she's a Typical Dingbat! Carbonaro does this in his act, but he calls it like it is, "Bullshit Science".
 
EV, in response to a flood of whining, butthurt members of a particular political persuasion and collective world view, the OT area was severely-truncated and many "political" threads deleted.

A general "edict" that we ought to avoid politics, at least for a while, was "issued", but IMHO the translation of that was that as long as we don't get too carried away with ad-hominem attacks, anything's up for discussion, which is as it should be IMHO.

No ad-hominem BS = opportunity to share and learn... IMHO. :thumbsup:
 
Krull":132n69nm said:
Poor sleeptard having a meltdown. Even had the ss.org mods tell him to cool it. Where you at sleepwell? LMAO @ reading 1984 and equating it to the Trump presidency. You are beyond delusional buddy. :LOL: :LOL:
:confused:
 
So Bernie wins again.

We've assumed all along that Bernie wouldn't survive the final vetting "process"; that the establishment wouldn't allow him to stand, just as it did in 2016.

Question:
Is there a limit as to how far left the Dems would move in order to gain office? I'm inclined to think not, based on what I've seen around the world and at home. IOW, if it believes Bernie can defeat Trump, it wouldn't surprise me if it gave him the final endorsement.

Radical, I know, and the implications would be huge if it won, but as I suggested, I'm learning to not underestimate the sacrifices bodies are willing to make in order to gain power.

The mere thought of it is friggin'-scary. :no:
 
Monkey Man":3d6z5udf said:
So Bernie wins again.

We've assumed all along that Bernie wouldn't survive the final vetting "process"; that the establishment wouldn't allow him to stand, just as it did in 2016.

Question:
Is there a limit as to how far left the Dems would move in order to gain office? I'm inclined to think not, based on what I've seen around the world and at home. IOW, if it believes Bernie can defeat Trump, it wouldn't surprise me if it gave him the final endorsement.

Radical, I know, and the implications would be huge if it won, but as I suggested, I'm learning to not underestimate the sacrifices bodies are willing to make in order to gain power.

The mere thought of it is friggin'-scary. :no:
The problem for them is the farther left they go, the more that normal people stop paying any attention, and the dem establishment knows it. The last thing they want is for Bernie to be the chosen one by the people. The media is already trying to bad mouth Bernie and make him seem like a bad choice, which is strange considering those on the right would probably guess they would shill for him at every opportunity. Its really not that unlike what happened with trump, the establishment tried to shove Jeb bush down our throats and we said NO... Jeb is a gutless shill and we won't allow it. The difference is that the democrats establishment is willing to undercut, lie and cheat their OWN PARTY to achieve what they want. Just like they did to Bernie last time...
Interesting to watch, We'll see what happens..
 
JTyson":1no07flz said:
Monkey Man":1no07flz said:
So Bernie wins again.

We've assumed all along that Bernie wouldn't survive the final vetting "process"; that the establishment wouldn't allow him to stand, just as it did in 2016.

Question:
Is there a limit as to how far left the Dems would move in order to gain office? I'm inclined to think not, based on what I've seen around the world and at home. IOW, if it believes Bernie can defeat Trump, it wouldn't surprise me if it gave him the final endorsement.

Radical, I know, and the implications would be huge if it won, but as I suggested, I'm learning to not underestimate the sacrifices bodies are willing to make in order to gain power.

The mere thought of it is friggin'-scary. :no:
The problem for them is the farther left they go, the more that normal people stop paying any attention, and the dem establishment knows it. The last thing they want is for Bernie to be the chosen one by the people. The media is already trying to bad mouth Bernie and make him seem like a bad choice, which is strange considering those on the right would probably guess they would shill for him at every opportunity. Its really not that unlike what happened with trump, the establishment tried to shove Jeb bush down our throats and we said NO... Jeb is a gutless shill and we won't allow it. The difference is that the democrats establishment is willing to undercut, lie and cheat their OWN PARTY to achieve what they want. Just like they did to Bernie last time...
Interesting to watch, We'll see what happens..
Thanks JT.

Yeah, Jeb came across as a nothing burger to me; he just had... nothing.

Didn't know the LSM is doing that to Bernie. Gives us some kind of hope I guess in that at least they're revealing that they'd prefer not to go too-far-left, although the priority would simply be to get someone, anyone on the left elected. :doh:
 
Monkey Man":r1220gz4 said:
JTyson":r1220gz4 said:
Monkey Man":r1220gz4 said:
So Bernie wins again.

We've assumed all along that Bernie wouldn't survive the final vetting "process"; that the establishment wouldn't allow him to stand, just as it did in 2016.

Question:
Is there a limit as to how far left the Dems would move in order to gain office? I'm inclined to think not, based on what I've seen around the world and at home. IOW, if it believes Bernie can defeat Trump, it wouldn't surprise me if it gave him the final endorsement.

Radical, I know, and the implications would be huge if it won, but as I suggested, I'm learning to not underestimate the sacrifices bodies are willing to make in order to gain power.

The mere thought of it is friggin'-scary. :no:
The problem for them is the farther left they go, the more that normal people stop paying any attention, and the dem establishment knows it. The last thing they want is for Bernie to be the chosen one by the people. The media is already trying to bad mouth Bernie and make him seem like a bad choice, which is strange considering those on the right would probably guess they would shill for him at every opportunity. Its really not that unlike what happened with trump, the establishment tried to shove Jeb bush down our throats and we said NO... Jeb is a gutless shill and we won't allow it. The difference is that the democrats establishment is willing to undercut, lie and cheat their OWN PARTY to achieve what they want. Just like they did to Bernie last time...
Interesting to watch, We'll see what happens..
Thanks JT.

Yeah, Jeb came across as a nothing burger to me; he just had... nothing.

Didn't know the LSM is doing that to Bernie. Gives us some kind of hope I guess in that at least they're revealing that they'd prefer not to go too-far-left, although the priority would simply be to get someone, anyone on the left elected. :doh:
Actually, its more that they are working with the dim establishment to knock him down a bit without being too obvious. They really do think they hold the rudder that drives what the consensus will be. It does work at some level on a limited number of tards who watch their horsecrap. Its actually exactly what was spoken of in the Russian defector vid posted in here earlier. Been going on a long time..
The reality is they have penned themselves into a corner and have no way to win the upcoming election, and they are figuring this out too late in the game for it to matter.
In the end, whoever the chosen one is will have to go into the cage and face the orange man..
The orange man will lift his leg and pee all over the chosen one, give him a nickname and watch the whole 2016 thing repeat itself :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
:LOL: :LOL: Too funny, man, and so true.

It feels like in the end it's gonna be a case of, "Well, who's gonna volunteer to have his ass handed to him on a platter?" :LOL: :LOL:

You know, I fear that this time 'round we may not be treated to as many Tears of Butthurt™, simply because the expectation won't be all unicorns and rainbows as it was in 2016. Perish the thought 'though; I wanna see me some Welcome to Reality Tears™, the absence of which would be like forgetting to put icing on a cake. :gethim:
 
BREAKING: DOJ Will Not Charge Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe — Attorneys Say ‘Case is Closed’

Trust the plan :LOL: :LOL:
 
Krull":3recbkii said:
Lol yea. Soon. Tik tok. :LOL: :LOL: it’s all political theatre.

A good ol' Andy classic -
"First We Fuck Flynn, Then We Fuck Trump"- Andrew McCabe

Hannity claims his sources say ‘something big is about to happen’…
reminder – The McCabe decision has nothing to do with John Durham...

Jeff Sessions - 637 days zero deep state indictments
Matt Whittaker - 100 days zero indictments
Bill Barr - 365 days and zero indictments
 
Build the wall! :LOL: :LOL:

NFowni4.png
 
Back
Top