Jeff Hilligan
Well-known member
Jam music bought US music and da brands. Not sure where the company stands but could just be inventory issues??
boyedav":bn7naz9i said:diagrammatiks":bn7naz9i said:I think Randall is just terrible at marketing.
They basically ran the rm series into the ground and that had a pretty big cult following. There's no reason that couldn't have been market better.
I mean take a look at backstar marketing...they came out of no where and they are everywhere now. It's not set in stone that only the established brands get to play.
I've played the 667. It's a fantastic sounding amp....but there's basically no marketing or anything associated with it unless you already know it's a fortin design.
I got a 667 used for $1K, and I think it sounds great. Using MDF to make the shells was a poor idea, but beyond that it seems rock solid. The transformers are massive and chassis mounted. I think Rez said there was a lot of sameness to each of the channels, and he was kinda right, but there's lot of room to do your own thing with each of them. With the six channels, three gain levels, and boost, there are a crazy combination of sounds. I moved mine into a road case, and it's my main gig amp.
diagrammatiks":bde92izc said:I think Randall is just terrible at marketing.
They basically ran the rm series into the ground and that had a pretty big cult following. There's no reason that couldn't have been market better.
I mean take a look at backstar marketing...they came out of no where and they are everywhere now. It's not set in stone that only the established brands get to play.
I've played the 667. It's a fantastic sounding amp....but there's basically no marketing or anything associated with it unless you already know it's a fortin design.
mchn13":3jwnr2o6 said:They shoulda kept making improved versions of the rg100es. The old black tolex ones looked classic, they were built like tanks, loud as hell, and like a Marshall, very versatile with different boosts or as a pedal platform. Back in the day they were the way to go when you lived in a rural town pre- internet, and an hour away from anyone who knew what an amp tech was lol.
misterspockyall":aalt802d said:Preparing for major shit-talk, but I've played the Kirk Hammett Fortin Randall for a solid 2 hours, and I think it sounds daaaaaaamn good. Crisp, tight, and edgy. It calls to me every time I go to my local shop, and it's been sitting and getting marked down for over a year.
napalmdeath":2b64vmvx said:They never even posted a demo of the Thrasher 50. NONE. Good sounding demos create the hype, and hype sells amps. Randall does the shittiest job of any company creating any buzz.
Bloodrock":22uko1mf said:I was a HUGE Randall fanboy back in the day. Sadly Randall should have passed with Dime. RIP. My old RG and Century still slay any of their modern stuff. Warhead=garbage, WarheadX2=awesome tone only when used with 4x12 & 2x15 warhead cabs, yet the x2's were horribly unreliable and impossible to get repaired. MTS series=some good tones, but not amazing, really just a gimmick to sell overpriced modules. Newer SS rg amps are muddy garbage. Diavlos are muddy and very meh sounding... thrasher is not much better. The 3 channel RT series a few years back had promise, but were junk, the master had to be cranked to about 8 to even get to band volume and by then all you got was horrible feedback. I say either go back to copying Marshall circuits or say bye bye Randall. Lol
boyedav":cd7h3l6h said:boyedav":cd7h3l6h said:diagrammatiks":cd7h3l6h said:I think Randall is just terrible at marketing.
They basically ran the rm series into the ground and that had a pretty big cult following. There's no reason that couldn't have been market better.
I mean take a look at backstar marketing...they came out of no where and they are everywhere now. It's not set in stone that only the established brands get to play.
I've played the 667. It's a fantastic sounding amp....but there's basically no marketing or anything associated with it unless you already know it's a fortin design.
I got a 667 used for $1K, and I think it sounds great. Using MDF to make the shells was a poor idea, but beyond that it seems rock solid. The transformers are massive and chassis mounted. I think Rez said there was a lot of sameness to each of the channels, and he was kinda right, but there's lot of room to do your own thing with each of them. With the six channels, three gain levels, and boost, there are a crazy combination of sounds. I moved mine into a road case, and it's my main gig amp.
I also agree that there's a disconnect between how they've priced some of their amps and what consumer perceptions are. I went through A LOT of $2-3K+ amps to arrive at the 667, and as much as I like the 667, I couldn't see myself paying $2500 for one brand new. I don't care who the designer is or what badge is on it, I think people have a tough time with a Made in China amp having the same price as the flagship amps from Engl/Bogner/H&K/Suhr/Mesa/Marshall. That doesn't mean it's a fair perception, just that that's how it is.
Look at the Egnater Tourmaster. Despite the early QA issues, I think they're really good amps. You can argue that comparing the 667 to the Tourmaster is apples-to-oranges, and that's somewhat true, but the differences in components and labor shouldn't add up to $1K given Chinese production costs. Neither of these amps have chassis mounted pots or tube sockets or appear to use other labor-intensive practices. Beyond that there's R&D, support, marketing, and every other cost of business that goes into the markup, plus profit. With Randall, it makes me wonder how much they paid to license Fortin's designs or if there are other costs they need to recoup. Or were they thinking that if a real Fortin-built Meathead costs $6K+, then people wouldn't bat an eye to get a mass-produced Randall "Meathead" for $2500.
Like I said, I love my 667. It sounds as good or better to me than the other amps I've played in the $2000-$3500 range, and it's crazy versatile. Aside from the MDF shell, the build quality seems to be there too. Most of us would have no problem paying $3000+ for this same amp if it were an Engl, H&K, Bogner, Mesa or other high-end Made in USA/Europe brand. The 667 may well be worth $2500 new, but I think we struggle with a Made in China amp that costs that much given what we know of Chinese production costs, and especially a Made in China amp that goes for Made in USA/Europe prices.