I own a Splawn and mostly wonder how it compares to the Quick Rod to know if I should get one too.While I haven't played the Suhr 100SE, it is a single channel amp. So, keep that in mind. I have played a few Kemper profiles of it, and wasn't impressed. But that could just be how someone else dialed it in.
I owned a 2005 QuickRod for about five years. Great sounding amps. They are LOUD!!! Like ungodly loud. I only ran it at one show when I didn't have to use my attenuator. (Outdoor festival show.) Two channels with a boost. The FX loop is ok, but nothing special.
I own a Splawn and mostly wonder how it compares to the Quick Rod to know if I should get one too. From what you described I'm even more interested of complete with the Suhr SE 100.Apples and Oranges, I've done demos for both, very different amps..The Quickrod can get more of a modded plexi VH tone whereas the Suhr is more of a smoother type of distortion a la Lukather, Schon, so really depends on what you're looking for.
Yeah I had and also sold the Suhr PT 100, still have a fully loaded Quickrod, which I really like. More marshall DNA in its sound compared to the Suhr.I was thinking about a Fully loaded newer Splawn I had with my brand new PT Sig Suhr
I have to say the Splawn was the winner.
To each there own though.
The PT 100 sounds like a totally different amp than the SE 100 from all the demos I've heard from it. From the demos of SE 100 that is. I've tried the PT 100 and it wasn't for me. Did like the OD100 though.Yeah I had and also sold the Suhr PT 100, still have a fully loaded Quickrod, which I really like. More marshall DNA in its sound compared to the Suhr.
This. I know you can adjust the sag on a Suhr, but I felt that they were too stiff.Splawn. Always splawn. From a feel point alone.
The Splawn competition is it.I'm trying not to buy a Splawn again. But I think I'd rather that than a Marshall or something
There is a Competition available right now near me trying to suck me in. Get back, Demon!The Splawn competition is it.