H3000 vs H9 vs MD-500?

  • Thread starter Thread starter glpg80
  • Start date Start date
My H9 didn't sound as good as my Eclipse, from what i've read the 3000 sounds even better again
 
harddriver said:
Now that you mentioned it, the MD-500 does seem a little thin on the top end.,:unsure: it doesn't sound crappy but.... I agree it's probably a wise choice going with Eventide that way you know you getting THE Eventide sound.:yes::2thumbsup:
Click to expand...
Yeah I have to agree. I’m glad I’m not the only one noticing a bit of the 8k+ region sounding thinned out.
 
I suppose rhe Micropitch Delay sounds like what you are looking for. I really don’t see what the H3000 brings to the table these days given the plethora of other devices that share these algorithms.
 
glpg80 said:
I have and honestly if I’m spending that kind of money I would just go with a larger eventide rack unit.

I think the boss MD-500 would do all that I need and more. It could do Roland dimension D and also do a great micropitch as linked in the video above. Not looking to spend a lot of money and love that it’s all stereo.

I could do a boss waza dimension D pedal and an eventide micropitch pedal, but the boss MD-500 seems good enough for both and is midi which removes a channel on my GCX.
Click to expand...
If you look through GC's used section you can get an Eclipse for pretty much half price or the price of two of their factor stomps and it delivers so much more. That's where I got my second Eclipse. It's a keeper!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top