For All Women Around The World.. ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben Waylin
  • Start date Start date
PLX said:
"Defamation" will not stand up in court if it's a true statement.. which in this case, what Gingrich was saying about Soros was verifiably true.
Click to expand...

The problem is, Newt claims the "DA's are Anti-police, and pro-criminal, and funded by Soros"

Will be a problem proving the "Anti-police, and pro-criminal" part (across the board) in a court of law.

Soros lawyers would each FOX's lunch.
 
CrazyNutz said:
The problem is, Newt claims the "DA's are Anti-police, and pro-criminal, and funded by Soros"

Will be a problem proving the "Anti-police, and pro-criminal" part (across the board) in a court of law.

Soros lawyers would each FOX's lunch.
Click to expand...
You haven't read the congressional report on Soros.. have you ?

None of that is a "theory" or "conjecture".
 
PLX said:
You haven't read the congressional report on Soros.. have you ?

None of that is a "theory" or "conjecture".
Click to expand...

What you need to have is internal documents across the board at these Soros funded DA offices that say "We are anti-police now", and "procriminal"

Otherwise it's all just political opinion, and that's how you get your ass sued off, if your a company like FOX.

Newt is protected, because politicians in this country can basically say anything they want an not get sued.
 
CrazyNutz said:
What you need to have is internal documents across the board at these Soros funded DA offices that say "We are anti-police now", and "procriminal"

Otherwise it's all just political opinion, and that's how you get your ass sued off, if your a company like FOX.

Newt is protected, because politicians in this country can basically say anything they want an not get sued.
Click to expand...
Squishy CuNtZ "Attorney at Law" :hys:
 
And this is why MAGA nuts get laughed out of court 99.9999% of the time :hys:
 
Findthetone1 said:
Man,
Another
GREAT
Ass!
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
Findthetone1 said:
But, how can you bestow upon us meager commoners your extensive legal knowledge without time in a court room, Squishy Matlock? :LOL:
Click to expand...

But It's merely common sense you are lacking, thus it is the only requirement to know you should haveth good solid evidence, not just quacky opinions. :ROFLMAO:
 
CrazyNutz said:
But It's merely common sense you are lacking, thus it is the only requirement to know you should haveth good solid evidence, not just quacky opinions. :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
But your post earlier SURELY indicates that you have extensive legal knowledge, yes? Please bless us with more, Matlock.
Common sense, though you think you possess, you are in great need of. For you follow the path of fools, and wear the wardrobe of a Vegas strip princess.
 
Findthetone1 said:
But your post earlier SURELY indicates that you have extensive legal knowledge, yes? Please bless us with more, Matlock.
Common sense, though you think you possess, you are in great need of. For you follow the path of fools, and wear the wardrobe of a Vegas strip princess.
Click to expand...

I can't bless you with common sense, you were supposed to be born with it. Sorry, faggot :ROFLMAO:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top